首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

合肥市公共场所从业人员吸烟及其影响因素研究
引用本文:张小鹏,张俊青,孙业桓. 合肥市公共场所从业人员吸烟及其影响因素研究[J]. 疾病控制杂志, 2013, 17(3): 261-264
作者姓名:张小鹏  张俊青  孙业桓
作者单位:1. 安徽医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,安徽合肥230032;合肥市疾病预防控制中心慢性病传染病防制科,安徽合肥230061
2. 合肥市疾病预防控制中心慢性病传染病防制科,安徽合肥,230061
3. 安徽医科大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,安徽合肥,230032
摘    要:
目的了解合肥市公共场所从业人员吸烟和被动吸烟现状以及吸烟的相关影响因素,为开展针对性控烟干预提供依据。方法本研究调查现场为合肥市区5个疾病预防控制中心体检门诊,采用分层抽样的方法抽取前来进行健康体检的公共场所从业人员作为调查对象,采用自行设计调查表进行问卷调查,了解从业人员吸烟和被动吸烟的情况及其影响因素。结果共调查合肥市公共场所从业人员1 211人,其中男性608人,女性603人。调查对象的吸烟率为25.9%,男性吸烟率48.8%,女性吸烟率2.8%。吸烟影响因素的多因素Logistic分析发现,男性、年龄、幼年时母亲吸烟、好朋友吸烟、认为"吸烟看起来很酷/很有魅力"是影响吸烟的危险因素,大专文化程度(相对于小学及以下)、好朋友不能接受吸烟、母亲不能接受吸烟、认为"吸烟看起来缺乏教养"是影响吸烟的保护因素。结论对公共场所从业人员吸烟情况应重点关注,并采取针对性的措施开展控烟干预。

关 键 词:吸烟  危险因素  流行病学研究

Study on smoking of public place workers and its influencing factor in Hefei City
ZHANG Xiao-peng,ZHANG Jun-qing,SUN Ye-huan. Study on smoking of public place workers and its influencing factor in Hefei City[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control and Prevention, 2013, 17(3): 261-264
Authors:ZHANG Xiao-peng  ZHANG Jun-qing  SUN Ye-huan
Affiliation:1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostntistic, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical Uni- versity, Hefei 230032, China; 2. Department of Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Education, Hefei Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Hefei 230061, China)
Abstract:
Objective To examine the smoking and passive smoking status among public place workers in Hefei City, and to analyze the influencing factors of them to provide basis for tobacco control. Methods The study was conduc- ted at medical examination centers of 5 Center for Disease Prevention and Control(CDC) in Hefei City. Public places work- ers who came to take health examination in 5 CDCs were recruited to take a face-to-face interview with stratified sampling method. A self-made questionnaire was designed to investigate smoking status. Results A total of 1 211 public place workers were investigated, 608 of them were male and 603 of them were female. Overall smoking prevalence was 25.9% (48. 8% for male and 2. 8% for female). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that risk factors of smoking were : male, age, mother' s smoking experience, friends' smoking experience, agree with "smoking looks charming and attractive", and protective factors were: getting a college or above degree, objection by friends and mother, agree with "smoking looks bad mannered". Conclusions Smoking status of public place workers should be focused, and pertinent strategies should be carried.
Keywords:Smoking  Risk factors  Epidemiologic studies
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号