首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

美罗培南持续泵入治疗ICU呼吸机相关性肺炎观察
引用本文:许治华,郭端,贾超. 美罗培南持续泵入治疗ICU呼吸机相关性肺炎观察[J]. 现代临床医学, 2013, 39(6): 412-413
作者姓名:许治华  郭端  贾超
作者单位:绵阳市中心医院,四川,绵阳,621000;绵阳市中心医院,四川,绵阳,621000;绵阳市中心医院,四川,绵阳,621000
摘    要:目的:观察ICU治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎时使用美罗培南静脉连续泵入的临床疗效。方法:将呼吸机相关性肺炎患者58例随机分为持续泵注组和间断输注组2组。持续泵注组28例,采用美罗培南3 g/24h静脉持续输注;间断输注组30例,采用美罗培南1 g在0.5 h内输注,每8 h输注1次。结果:持续泵注组治疗成功率提高,患者机械通气时间缩短,患者经济支出有降低。2组不良反应的发生无显著性差异。结论:美罗培南持续泵注治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎疗效更佳,可减少医疗费用,且安全性好。

关 键 词:肺炎  呼吸机相关性  美罗培南  持续泵入  ICU
收稿时间:2013-09-17
修稿时间:2013-09-17

Clinical Efficacy of Meropenem by Continuous Infusion in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
XU Zhihu,GUO Duan and JIA Chao. Clinical Efficacy of Meropenem by Continuous Infusion in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia[J]. Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine, 2013, 39(6): 412-413
Authors:XU Zhihu  GUO Duan  JIA Chao
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of continuous infusion of meropenem for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Methods:Fifty-eight patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia were randomly divided into two groups.One group received meropenem by continuous infusion (3 g over 24 h), the other by intermittent infusion (1 g over 30 min every 6 h).Results:The group receiving medication by continuous infusion showed a greater clinical cure rate,shorter mechanical ventilation time and less economic cost than the group treated with intermittent infusion.There were no significant differences of adverse events between the two groups.Conclusions:Meropenem administered by continuous infusion have more clinical efficacy,less economic cost than intermittent infusion,and the administration by continuous infusion is safe.
Keywords:pneumonia  ventilator-associated  meropenem  continuously intravenous injection  ICU
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代临床医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代临床医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号