经乳晕腔镜手术与开放手术治疗良性甲状腺肿瘤的临床对比分析

目的 :对经乳晕径路腔镜手术和开放甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺良性肿瘤的临床效果进行比较研究. 方法 :回顾性分析2002年8月～2008年5月102例经乳晕径路的腔镜下甲状腺切除术(腔镜组)和105例开放甲状腺切除术(开放组)患者的临床资料,比较两组的手术时间、住院费用、出血量、疼痛评分、住院时间、术后镇痛药的需求、引流量、术后并发症等. 结果 :两组手术中出血量无显著性差异(P=0.531);腔镜组手术时间为(124.59±42.48)分钟,开放组为(92.02±32.20)分钟,腔镜组明显长于开放组(P<0.05);住院时间和住院费用比较,腔镜组分别为(10.18±4.44)天、(6416.51±976.34)元,而开放组分别为(8.80±3.34)天和(4 118.07±1 354.66)元,腔镜组引流量(90.2±78.4)ml,开放组(50.2±20.5)ml,统计学比较均为P<0.05,腔镜组多于开放组;腔镜组术后并发症喉返神经损伤和开放组比较虽无统计学差异,但损伤几率大,发生率为2.94%(3/102);而腔镜组术后疼痛感和镇痛药需求比开放组明显减少. 结论 :腔镜下甲状腺手术是一种安全、可行的方法,具有美容和疼痛轻的优点;但进一步拓宽应用需要重视和克服喉返神经损伤几率高、住院费用高、住院时间长、术后引流量大等缺点.

Comparison between Conventional Open Thyroidectomy and Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Benign Thyroid Tumor

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of endoscopic thyroidectomy using an approach through the breast and conventional open thyroidectomy for benign thyroid diseases. Methods: A total of 207 cases of be- nign thyroid diseases were surgically treated from August 2002 to May 2008, including 102 cases that under- went endoscopic thyroidectomy (endoscopic group) and 105 cases that underwent traditional thyroidectomy (traditional group). The surgery duration, hospitalization cost, blood loss, Visual Analogu...