| Abstract: | Evidence increasingly supports keratoconus as an inherited, genetic disorder. If this is the case, it would be expected to express itself as a binocular condition even though variable expression of the gene may show differing levels in the two eyes. It is a common occurrence in specialist contact lens practices to see pseudo‐monocular keratoconus, that is, an overt clinical level of the condition in one eye and forme fruste keratoconus in the other. The advent of videokeratoscopy has shown almost every case of apparent monocular keratoconus to be different expressions of the condition in the two eyes. Nevertheless, rare cases of the condition are seen that appear to be truly monocular. Such a case is presented in which the condition has been present for more than 23 years. The age of the subject makes the future onset of keratoconus highly unlikely and videokeratoscopy does not show the presence of forme fruste in the ‘good’ eye. There is no history of monocular eye rubbing. Pachymetry shows the normal eye to be well within the range of normal corneal thickness, while the keratoconus in the other eye is sufficiently advanced to warrant corneal grafting. Thus, it is a case of true monocular keratoconus and represents an extreme example of variable gene expression. |
