Discussing prognosis with terminally ill cancer patients and relatives: A survey of physicians’ intentions in seven countries |
| |
Authors: | Jennifer Voorhees Judith Rietjens Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen Luc Deliens Colleen Cartwright Karin Faisst Michael Norup Guido Miccinesi Agnes van der Heide |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;2. Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium;4. Aged Services Learning and Research Center, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia;5. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;6. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark;g Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveTo determine the extent to which physicians in different countries intend to inform terminal patients and relatives about prognosis, and to identify physician characteristics associated with an active approach to such discussions.MethodsIn the context of a European research project, a study on disclosing prognosis was conducted in seven countries. A written questionnaire with questions regarding hypothetical cases and actual practices was sent to physicians from specialties involved in the care of dying patients.Results10,139 questionnaires were studied. The response rate was greater than 50% in all countries except Italy (39%). The percentage of physicians who indicated that they would actively inform competent patients of their prognosis varied between countries from 52% in Italy to 99% in Sweden. For informing relatives of incompetent patients, rates were higher, ranging from 86% in Denmark to 98% in Australia. Younger physician age and training in palliative care were associated with an active intention to discuss prognosis.ConclusionPhysicians’ intentions to discuss prognosis with patients and families vary largely across countries. Physician age and training in palliative care may also affect intentions.Practice implicationsContinuing training should focus on improving physicians’ ability to communicate responsibly about prognosis with patients and families. |
| |
Keywords: | Prognosis Communication End-of-life |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|