首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

肾移植术后将CCB替换为ARB控制高血压和蛋白尿的效果
引用本文:周梅生,王立明,韩澍,傅尚希,赵闻雨,郑鳕洋,曾力,张雷,朱有华. 肾移植术后将CCB替换为ARB控制高血压和蛋白尿的效果[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2011, 32(11). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2011.11.004
作者姓名:周梅生  王立明  韩澍  傅尚希  赵闻雨  郑鳕洋  曾力  张雷  朱有华
作者单位:200003上海.第二军医大学附属长征医院器官移植科
摘    要:
目的 研究肾移植术后将钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)替换为血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)控制肾移植远期高血压和蛋白尿的有效性和安全性.方法 将肾移植术后5~20年,并服用CCB药物治疗高血压的127例受者纳入研究,所有受者均无糖尿病,移植肾功能保持稳定.采用随机数字表法将受者分为2组,实验组65例,纳入研究前受者均单用CCB,纳入研究后停用CCB,改用氯沙坦50~100 mg/d;对照组62例,维持CCB用药不变.对两组受者进行随访,随访时间为2年,观察血、尿常规,肝、肾功能,血脂,电解质,24 h尿蛋白定量,以及CNI血药浓度等指标的变化.结果 随访期间,两组受者的血压均能保持在正常水平.实验组受者24h尿蛋白定量由随访前的(176.32±54.54)mg下降至随访2年时的(155.69±62.25)mg,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);随访2年时,对照组受者的尿蛋白水平略有上升,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组受者的血脂水平与随访前相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但高密度脂蛋白水平由随访前的(2.25±0.26)mmol/L升高到随访2年时的(2.46±0.31)mmol/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组受者随访前与随访2年后的血常规、肝肾功能、血钾及CNI血药浓度等检查指标的差异均无统计学意义.结论 肾移植术后远期使用CCB和ARB治疗高血压都是安全、有效的,而应用ARB对于减少蛋白尿和降低心血管事件的风险可能会更好.

关 键 词:肾移植  高血压  蛋白尿  钙通道阻滞剂  血管紧张素受体阻滞剂

Effect of conversion from CCB to ARB in treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients
ZHOU Mei-sheng,WANG Li-ming,HAN Shu,FU Shang-xi,ZHAO Wen-yu,ZHENG Xue-yang,ZENG Li,ZHANG Lei,ZHU You-hua. Effect of conversion from CCB to ARB in treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation, 2011, 32(11). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2011.11.004
Authors:ZHOU Mei-sheng  WANG Li-ming  HAN Shu  FU Shang-xi  ZHAO Wen-yu  ZHENG Xue-yang  ZENG Li  ZHANG Lei  ZHU You-hua
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of conversion from CCB to ARB in the treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients.Methods 127 long-term recipients who used CCB as their anti-hypertensive drug were enrolled.All recipients had stable renal function and no diabetes.Recipients were randomly assigned to experimental group (65 cases) which received ARB (Losartan,50~ 100 mg/day) instead of CCB,or control group (62 cases) which received routine CCB.All recipients were followed up for 2 years.Blood count,urinalysis,liver and kidney chemistry,blood lipid,serum electrolytes,24-h urine protein,blood concentration of CNI drugs and other biochemical indexes were observed.Results During the 2-year follow-up,the blood pressure of the two groups was maintained within normal level.The 24-h urine protein was decreased in the experimental group ( 176.32 ± 54.54 to 155.69 ± 62.25,P<0.05),but increased slightly in the control group (P>0.05).Although the blood lipid of the experimental group was not different before and after the follow-up,the high density lipoprotein (HDL) was increased statistically (2.25 ± 0.26 to 2.46 ±0.31,P<0.05).The blood count,liver and kidney chemistry,serum potassium,blood concentration of CNI drugs in both groups showed no significant differences.Conclusion Both CCB and ARB could be effectively and safely used for the treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in kidney transplant recipients.ARB would be more effective in reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD)rate and decreasing proteinuria.
Keywords:Kidney transplantation  Hypertension  Proteinuria  Calcium channel blockers  Angiotensin receptors blockers
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号