首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Improvement in the outcome of patients with antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia using gentle ventilation and circulatory stabilization
Authors:Kouji Masumoto  Risa Teshiba  Genshiro Esumi  Kouji Nagata  Yasushi Takahata  Shunji Hikino  Toshiro Hara  Satoshi Hojo  Kiyomi Tsukimori  Norio Wake  Naoko Kinukawa  Tomoaki Taguchi
Affiliation:1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
2. Department of Pediatrics, Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
4. Department of Medical Information Science, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
Abstract:
Background/Objectives  No definitive treatment strategy has been established for patients with an antenatal diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia (AD-CDH). From 1997 to 2003 in this department fetal stabilization (FS) was administered using both morphine and diazepam via the placenta just before delivery of the fetus by cesarean section. In contrast, from 2004 to the present, a combination of gentle ventilation (GV) and a delayed operation was selected, which was performed when the patient’s circulatory stabilization (CS) was achieved. Patients and methods  This study included 22 patients in the FS group and 16 patients in the GV + CS group, respectively. The outcomes in both groups were compared and the outcome in AD-CDH patients with a patch repaired operation, liver-up or lower lung-to-thorax transverse area ratio (L/T, <0.10) was further investigated in both groups. Results  The overall survival rate (SR) was 93.8% in the GV + CS group and 59.1% in the FS group, respectively (P = 0.04). For the patients with the lower L/T, the SR was 85.7% in GV + CS group and 53.8% in the FS group (P = 0.33). Regarding the patients using a patch and liver-up, the SR in GV + CS group was better than that in the FS group (patch: FS 44.4%, GV ± CS 87.5%, P = 0.18; liver-up: FS 57.8 and 87.5%, P = 0.30). Conclusion  Our strategy of using GV ± CS might thus be considered to be more effective than that using FS in the treatment of AD-CDH patients.
Keywords:Congenital diaphragmatic hernia  Antenatal diagnosis  Outcome  Gentle ventilation  Circulatory stabilization
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号