首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

微创拔牙术在临床工作中的疗效分析
引用本文:高学琴,董亚鹏. 微创拔牙术在临床工作中的疗效分析[J]. 现代保健, 2014, 0(7): 85-87
作者姓名:高学琴  董亚鹏
作者单位:河南省新乡市第二人民医院,河南新乡453000
摘    要:
目的:通过比较微创拔牙法与传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生智齿的临床应用效果,寻找更合理的阻生齿的拔除方案。方法:选择临床需要拔除下颌各种阻生齿的患者180例,按随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,每组90例,分别采用高速涡轮机结合微创拔牙刀和传统拔牙器械拔除患牙。比较两组拔牙过程中畏惧发生率及术后张口度、疼痛、拔牙窝完整性等的差异。结果:试验组的牙科畏惧症发生率明显低于对照组,手术效果明显优于传统组,差异均具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:微创拔牙法拔除下颌阻生齿可达到无痛、安全、微创的目的,更适合临床推广应用。

关 键 词:微创拔牙刀  高速涡轮钻  下颌阻生智齿拔除

Analysis of Curative Effect of Minimally Invasive Exodontia in Clinical Work
Affiliation:GAO Xue-qin, DONG Ya- peng( The Second People's Hospital of Xinxiang City, Xinxiang 453000, China)
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical application effect of minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction method of extraction of impacted mandibular third molars extraction of impacted,for more reasonable. Method:180 cases of all kinds of mandibular impacted teeth needed to be extracted were chosen,they were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,90 cases in each group,respectively,used high speed turbine combined with minimally invasive extraction and traditional extraction instrument knife teeth extracted,the difference of mouth opening, pain,tooth nest integrity and incidence of fear between the two groups were compared. Result:The experimental group groups with dental fear was significantly lower than that of the control group,operation effect was better than the traditional group, the difference was statistically significant between two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion:Minimally invasive extraction method of extracting impacted mandibular third molars can achieve painless,safe,minimally invasive,is more suitable for clinical application.
Keywords:Minimally invasive dental knife  High speed turbine  Mandibular third molars' extraction
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号