首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

深圳市龙华区糖尿病社区管理评价指标体系的建立
引用本文:夏慧,李海涛,于传宁,刘晓玲,宁洁,李慧.深圳市龙华区糖尿病社区管理评价指标体系的建立[J].实用预防医学,2020,27(7):818-820.
作者姓名:夏慧  李海涛  于传宁  刘晓玲  宁洁  李慧
作者单位:1.深圳市龙华区慢性病防治中心,广东 深圳 518110;2.深圳大学总医院,广东 深圳 518110;3.深圳市龙华区中心医院,广东 深圳 518110;4.山东大学医药卫生管理学院,山东 济南 250014
基金项目:深圳市龙华区科技创新资金项目(2017026);广东省自然科学基金项目(2017A030310439)
摘    要:目的 构建深圳市龙华区的糖尿病社区管理评价指标体系,为科学评价社区卫生服务中心工作质量提供依据。方法 通过文献回顾等方法初步确定指标体系框架,运用德尔菲法,经过两轮筛选最终确立评价指标体系和权重。结果 两轮专家的积极系数分别为90.9%和100.0%;专家权威系数Cr为0.7564;三级指标的第二轮专家协调系数W分别为0.611、0.594和0.546(P<0.001),具有较好一致性;筛选出一级指标3个,二级指标11个,三级指标32个。一级指标中过程指标的权重最高,为0.400,其次为结果指标,为0.350。三级指标中,药品配备种类和糖尿病相关知识权重最高,分别是0.093和0.072。结论 本研究结果的可信度较好,建立的糖尿病社区管理评价指标体系可为政策制定者开展社区卫生服务评价提供参考。

关 键 词:糖尿病  评价  指标体系  社区管理  
收稿时间:2019-09-16

Establishment of an evaluation index system for community managementof diabetes mellitus in Longhua district of Shenzhen city
XIA Hui,LI Hai-tao,YU Chuan-ning,LIU Xiao-ling,NING Jie,LI Hui.Establishment of an evaluation index system for community managementof diabetes mellitus in Longhua district of Shenzhen city[J].Practical Preventive Medicine,2020,27(7):818-820.
Authors:XIA Hui  LI Hai-tao  YU Chuan-ning  LIU Xiao-ling  NING Jie  LI Hui
Institution:1. Shenzhen Longhua District Chronic Disease Control Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, China;2. General Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, China;3. Shenzhen Longhua District Central Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518110, China;4. School of Medicine and Health Management, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China
Abstract:Objective To construct an evaluation index system for community management of diabetes mellitus in Longhua district of Shenzhen city so as to provide evidence for scientifically evaluating the quality of community health services. Methods With the method of literature review, a preliminary index system was established. Using Delphi method, two rounds of screening were performed to finally determine the evaluation index system and the weight of each index. Results The positive coefficients of two rounds of expert consultation were 90.9% and 100%, respectively. The authoritative coefficient, Cr was 0.7564. Kendall's W coordination coefficients of the second round of expert consultation were 0.611, 0.594 and 0.546, respectively (P<0.01), and the experts reached a high consensus in this regard. The final indicators comprised 3 primary indexes, 11 secondary indexes and 32 tertiary indexes. Among the primary indexes, process index was the highest (0.400), followed by outcome index (0.350). The categories of diabetes drug and diabetes-related knowledge were the two tertiary indexes with the highest weight, which were 0.093 and 0.072, respectively. Conclusions The results of the expert consultation are believable. The diabetes community-based indicators constructed in this study can provide policymakers with scientific references in evaluating community health service.
Keywords:diabetes mellitus  evaluation  index system  community management  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《实用预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《实用预防医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号