首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

江苏省淮安市常住居民健康素养影响因素分析
引用本文:刘卫东,俞清,刘林飞,王莉娜,张万红,徐慧,江荣,刘静.江苏省淮安市常住居民健康素养影响因素分析[J].中华健康管理学杂志,2014(2):120-123.
作者姓名:刘卫东  俞清  刘林飞  王莉娜  张万红  徐慧  江荣  刘静
作者单位:[1]江苏省淮安市疾病预防控制中心,223001 [2]东南大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,223001
摘    要:目的 了解江苏省淮安市常住居民健康素养水平分布状况,并探索其影响因素,为制定健康教育干预策略和措施提供依据.方法 采用分层多阶段整群随机抽样的方法,于2012年9至12月对淮安市15~ 69岁3 480名常住居民进行问卷调查,调查内容分为基本知识和理念、健康生活方式和行为、基本技能等三个维度;按健康问题分为科学健康观、传染病预防、慢性病预防、安全与急救、基本医疗和其他等6类.对健康素养水平影响因素进行x2检验和Logistic回归分析.结果 3 480名调查对象具备健康素养水平的人数为424名,健康素养水平为12.2%.单因素分析显示,城乡、性别、不同年龄组、不同文化程度、不同职业人群、家庭年收入高低,健康素养水平差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析显示,相对于农村,城市对健康素养影响的OR (95% CI)值为1.558(1.234~ 1.966);相对于不识字或识字很少,小学、初中、高中/职高/中专、大专/本科及以上对健康素养影响的OR(95%CI)值分别为4.651 (2.327~9.295)、9.833 (5.121~ 18.880)、15.451 (7.798~ 30.615)和22.937(10.766~ 48.870);相对于公务员,医务人员对健康素养影响的OR(95%CI)值为3.789(1.292~11.114);相对于家庭年收入<30 000元,≥30 000元对健康素养影响的OR(95%CI)值为1.478(1.149~1.901),是健康素养的促进(危险)因素.结论 淮安市15~ 69岁常住居民健康素养水平为12.2%,健康素养水平较低,应加强健康素养干预和监测研究,制定有效的对策和措施,促进健康素养水平的全面提高.

关 键 词:健康素养  问卷调查  Logistic模型

Affacting factors of health literacy among Huaian residents
Authors:Liu Weidong*  Yu Qing  Liu Linfei  Wang Lina  Zhang Wanhong  Xu Hui  Jiang Rong  Liu Jing
Institution:. *Institute for Health Education, Huaian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huaian 223001, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate health literacy and its affacting factors in of Huaian residents so as to provide evidence for comprehensive health education. Methods A total of 3 480 subjects aged 15-69 years old were recruited from Huaian city in the second half of 2012 by using stratified multi-stage cluster random sampling. Three dimensions were covered in this investigation: basic knowledge and concept, healthy lifestyle and behavior, and basic skills. Six health problems were involved: scientific healthy concept, prevention of infectious disease, prevention of chronic disease, safety and first aid, basic medical and others. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used for data analysis. Results The health literacy ratio was 12.2% (424/3480). In single factor analysis, urban and rural, gender, age, education, job, income were affecting factors of health literacy (P〈0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of urban vs rural areas was 1.558 (1.234-1.966), OR (95%C/) of primary school vs illiteracy was 4.651 (2.327-9.295), OR (95%C/) of junior high school vs illiteracy was 9.833 (5.121- 18.880), OR (95%C/) of senior high school vs illiteracy was 15.451 (7.798-30.615), and OR (95%C/) of undergraduate vs illiteracy was 22.937 (10.766-48.870). In addition, OR (95%C/) was 3.789 (1.292-11.114) when medical personnel was compared with civil servants, and OR (95%C/) was 1.478 (1.149-1.901) when adults whose household income over ¥ 30 000 was compard with those below ¥ 30 000. Conclusion The rate of health literacy among Huaian residents was 12.2%. Health literacy intervention and monitoring should be strengthened and the preventive control measures should be established to improve residents' health literacy.
Keywords:Health literacy  Questionnaires  Logistic models
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号