首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

循证卒中医学
引用本文:J.van Gijn. 循证卒中医学[J]. 国际脑血管病杂志, 2004, 12(1): 7-10
作者姓名:J.van Gijn
作者单位:From the
摘    要:
临床真实性与临床对照试验的方法相互影响的持续存在是很理想的。一项良好的试验设计应能反映医生、特别是患者的观点,相反,熟悉临床试验也能改进日常工作方法。换句话说,每种方法学原理都源于临床实践。例如:随机化(建设性的怀疑作为其实践的对象)、独立性(对医药公司善意的不信任)、知情同意(让患者了解不确定性)、Ⅰ类错误(在一项试验后不错误的乐观)、Ⅱ类错误(在一项试验后不错误的悲观)、选择正确的转归指标(恰当性比准确性更重要)、意向处理原则(注重实效的分析)以及亚组分析的危险性(“我的最后一例患者综合征”)。

关 键 词:循证医学  卒中  随机对照临床试验

Evidence-based Stroke Medicine
J.Van Gijn. Evidence-based Stroke Medicine[J]. International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2004, 12(1): 7-10
Authors:J.Van Gijn
Affiliation:J.Van Gijn(From the Department of Neurology, Room G03.228, University Medical Centre, Heidelberglaan 100, 3581 CX Utrecht The Netherlands);
Abstract:
Ideally, there is continuous interaction between clinical reality and the methods of controlled clinical trials. The design of a proper trial ought to reflect the physician's and especially the patient's point of view, and conversely a familiarity with clinical trials improves the methods of daily practice. In other words, every methodological principle is rooted in clinical practice. Some examples are: randomisation (with constructive doubt as its practical counterpart), independence (a healthy mistrust of drug companies), informed consent (sharing uncertainty with patients), type I error (no false optimism after a single trial), type II error (no false pessimism after a single trial), choosing the right measure of outcome (relevance outweighs precision), the intention-to-treat principle (pragmatic analysis), and the dangers of subgroup analysis (the 'my-last-patient syndrome').
Keywords:evidence-based medicine stroke randomised controlled clinical trials
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号