首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Five types of OECD healthcare systems: Empirical results of a deductive classification
Authors:Katharina Bö  hm,Achim Schmid,Ralf Gö  tze,Claudia Landwehr,Heinz Rothgang
Affiliation:1. University of Mainz, Germany;2. Collaborative Research Center “Transformations of the State”, University of Bremen, Germany;3. Center for Social Policy Research, University of Bremen, Germany
Abstract:This article classifies 30 OECD healthcare systems according to a deductively generated typology by Rothgang and Wendt [1]. This typology distinguishes three core dimensions of the healthcare system: regulation, financing, and service provision, and three types of actors: state, societal, and private actors. We argue that there is a hierarchical relationship between the three dimensions, led by regulation, followed by financing and finally service provision, where the superior dimension restricts the nature of the subordinate dimensions. This hierarchy rule limits the number of theoretically plausible types to ten. To test our argument, we classify 30 OECD healthcare systems, mainly using OECD Health Data and WHO country reports. The classification results in five system types: the National Health Service, the National Health Insurance, the Social Health Insurance, the Etatist Social Health Insurance, and the Private Health System. All five types belong to the group of healthcare system types considered theoretically plausible. Merely Slovenia does not comply with our assumption of a hierarchy among dimensions and typical actors due to its singular transformation history.
Keywords:Classification   Healthcare systems   OECD
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号