首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery using the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: A prospective multicentric study
Affiliation:1. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, TMP-3, New Haven, CT 06520;2. Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520;3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06516;4. VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave, West Haven, CT 06516;5. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520;1. Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan;2. Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan;3. Department of Oncology, Wayne State University/University Physician Group, Division of Radiation Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
Abstract:AimProviding head and neck cancer patients with adequate information is essential to their confidence and satisfaction regarding medical care. The aims of this study were to evaluate patient perceptions of the information received, the predictive factors of such perceptions and their potential correlation with patient quality of life (QoL).MethodsWe conducted a prospective multicentric study using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires before and after surgery.ResultsThis study enrolled 200 patients, 149 men and 51 women, mean age 63.5 ± 10.3 years. Before and after treatment, global QLQ-INFO25 scores were 39.3 and 42.5, respectively, whereas satisfaction with the information received scores were 69.9 and 58.1, respectively. Regarding EORTC QLQ-INFO25 scores, between the pre- and post-treatment periods, we observed a significant increase in three scales/items (information about other services, information about different places of care and information about things you can do to help yourself) and a significant decrease in two scales/items (satisfaction with the information received and overall the information has been helpful). Before and after treatment, global QoL scores were 62.7 and 61.0, respectively. Overall, we found low correlations between QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 scores. Patient age and education level, centre of care, tumour site and treatment characteristics had a significant impact on QLQ-INFO25 scores.ConclusionPerceived information was satisfactory in the perioperative period for head and neck cancer patients. Several demographic and clinical factors were identified as significant predictors of QLQ-INFO25 scores.
Keywords:Information  Satisfaction  Quality of life  Head and neck cancer  Surgery
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号