Natural Progression of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction |
| |
Authors: | Antony Leslie Innasimuthu Sanjay Kumar Jason Lazar William E. Katz |
| |
Affiliation: | Cardiovascular Division (Drs. Innasimuthu, Kumar, and Lazar), State University of New York–Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203; and Cardiovascular Institute (Dr. Katz), Scaife Hall, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 |
| |
Abstract: | Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371–1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>0.50) during and after follow-up.At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm2), moderate stenosis (≥1 to <1.5 cm2), or severe stenosis (<1 cm2). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean <40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS.At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035).Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up. |
| |
Keywords: | Aortic valve stenosis blood flow velocity calcinosis/complications disease progression echocardiography forecasting prognosis retrospective studies risk assessment stroke volume time factors ventricular function left |
|
|