Proximal humeral fractures treated with arthroplasty

P74ro50x%iyme aaolrfs h houulmdm.eer raAalfl t effrrraa cactgtuuerr ee5ss0,ainc wc oopumanteiten nf othsra vomeldo reaer m tthhucaanhnhigher incidence of proximal humeral fractures thanmen.In patients younger than50years old,high-energy trauma is the most common cause of proximalhumeral fractures,and after age50,minimal-to-moderate trauma is the most common cause.1Neer s classification,the most popularclassification system for proximal humeral fractures,isbased on the anatomical relationship o…

Proximal humeral fractures treated with arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE: To explore arthroplasty in treating 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. METHODS: A total of 132 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated in our hospital from July 1997 to February 2003. According to Neer's classification, the fractures of 45 patients (14 males and 31 females, aged 31-78 years, 56.1 years+/-7.8 years on an average) belonged to 3- or 4-part fractures (10 patients with 4-part fracture and 35 with 3-part comminuted fracture) and they were treated with shoulder joint arthroplasty. Unipolar prosthesis replacement of the head of humerus was made in 28 cases, while bipolar prosthesis replacement in 2 cases and total shoulder joint replacement in 15 cases. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (range: 12-72 months, mean: 37.3 months+/-4.1 months), among the 45 patients who suffered from fractures of the proximal humerus and underwent arthroplasty surgery, 44 patients (97.8%) had no postoperative pain and were satisfied with the active range of motion and with the whole treatment results. And radiography showed that the prostheses were at their good position. One patient had postoperative pain because he had so narrow medullary cavity that the humeral prosthesis could not be put deeply enough and the prosthesis head was a little higher over the anatomic level. He did not have good postoperative active range of motion, either. Then he received a review surgery and got satisfied results. Temporary shoulder stiffness was observed in one patient. Manual release of these adhesions improved the shoulder function. No evidence of nonunion of the fracture segments around the humeral prosthesis stem was found. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder arthroplasty is a dependable method to restore the comfort and function of the shoulder joints of the patients with 3- or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus.