The Role of the Nucleus Accumbens Shell in the Mediation of the Reinforcing Properties of a Safety Signal in Free-Operant Avoidance: Dopamine-Dependent Inhibitory Effects of d-amphetamine |
| |
Authors: | Anushka BP Fernando Gonzalo P Urcelay Adam C Mar Tony A Dickinson Trevor W Robbins |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK;2. Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge,UK |
| |
Abstract: | Safety signals (SSs) have been shown to reinforce instrumental avoidance behavior due to their ability to signal the absence of an aversive event; however, little is known of their neural mediation. This study investigated whether infusions of d-amphetamine in the nucleus accumbens (Nac), previously shown to potentiate responding for appetitive conditioned reinforcers (CRfs), also regulate avoidance responding for a SS. Rats were trained on a free-operant task in which lever-press responses avoided shock and were reinforced with an auditory SS. Rats were then cannulated in the Nac core (NacC) or shell (NacS) and infused with d-amphetamine and, in separate NacS groups, other drugs, before extinction sessions with the SS present or absent following responding. Selective effects of d-amphetamine were found in the NacS, but not in the NacC, when the SS was present in the session. A significant increase in response rate during the presentation of the SS reflected a disruption of its fear-inhibiting properties. In parallel, a decrease in avoidance response rate reflected the reduced influence of the SS as a CRf. Inactivation of the NacS reduced avoidance responding only when the SS was present in the session, whereas the D1–D2 DA receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol reduced responding both before and during the SS regardless of the presence of the SS. Atomoxetine (ATO), a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, had no effect on responding. These results indicate a role for the NacS in the mediation of the conditioned reinforcing properties of a SS. These effects appear to be modulated by dopaminergic mechanisms but seem distinct from those previously reported with food-related CRfs. |
| |
Keywords: | avoidance dopamine safety signals psychostimulants neuropharmacology behavioral science |
|
|