The Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58): Can a Rasch developed patient reported outcome measure satisfy traditional psychometric criteria? |
| |
| Authors: | Stefan J Cano Thomas T Warner Alan J Thompson Kailash P Bhatia Ray Fitzpatrick Jeremy C Hobart |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1) Neurological Outcome Measures Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK;(2) Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Room N16 ITTC Building,Tamar Science Park, Davy Road, Plymouth, UK;(3) Department of Clinical Neurosciences Royal Free &, University College Medical School, London, UK;(4) Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UK;(5) Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | ![]()
Background The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are currently producing guidelines for the scientific adequacy of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical trials, which will have implications for the selection of scales used in future clinical trials. In this study, we examine how the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58), a rigorous Rasch measurement developed neurologic PROM, stands up to traditional psychometric criteria for three reasons: 1) provide traditional psychometric evidence for the CDIP-58 in line with proposed FDA guidelines; 2) enable researchers and clinicians to compare it with existing dystonia PROMs; and 3) help researchers and clinicians bridge the knowledge gap between old and new methods of reliability and validity testing. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
