首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同术式治疗下段食管癌的疗效观察
引用本文:李治,李娜娜.不同术式治疗下段食管癌的疗效观察[J].广州医学院学报,2010,38(6):72-75.
作者姓名:李治  李娜娜
作者单位:1. 怀化市第一人民医院心胸外科,湖南,怀化,418000
2. 新乡医学院人体解剖学教研室,河南,新乡,453003
摘    要:目的:探讨经胸及经左胸腹联合行下段食管癌根治术的临床疗效.方法:回顾性分析经胸入路(34例)和经左胸腹联合入路(40例)行下段食管癌根治术患者的临床资料,术中行胸、腹淋巴结清扫,术后行病理组织学检查了解淋巴结转移情况.术后观察2周,比较2组忠者的淋巴结肿瘤转移度、手术时间、术中出血量、围手术期死亡率、并发症发生率、手术住院时间.结果:经胸与经左胸腹联合行下端食管癌根治术比较,手术时间短(2.6 4±0.8)h vs(4.7 4±1.1)h,P〈0.05]、出血量少(418.5 4±112.5)mLvs(693.5.4±124.8)mL,P〈0.05]、围术期并发症发生率低5.9%(2/34)vs 22.5%(9/40),P〈0.05]、手术住院时间缩短(15.5±4.7)dvs(24.8 4±6.5)d,P〈0.05];2组手术切除淋巴结肿瘤转移度差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论:经胸行下段食管癌根治术,手术损伤小、恢复快,但远期存活率仍需观察.

关 键 词:食管肿瘤  消化系统外科手术  治疗结果  回顾性研究

Outcomes of lower segment esophageal carcinoma treated with various surgical approaches
LI Zhi,LI Na-na.Outcomes of lower segment esophageal carcinoma treated with various surgical approaches[J].Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College,2010,38(6):72-75.
Authors:LI Zhi  LI Na-na
Institution:1Department of Cardiothoraeie Surgery, First Municipal People's Hospital of Huaihna, Huaihua Hunan 418000; 2 Department of Human Anatomy, Xinxiang Medical College,Xirtxiang Henan 453003, China)
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the outcomes of lower segment esophageal carcinoma treated with transthoracic versus transhiatal radical esophagectomy. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 34 patients who underwent transthoracic radical esophagectomy (transthoracic group,or group A) and another 40 patients who underwent left transhiatal radical esophagectomy ( transhiatal group, or group B ) for lower esophageal carcinoma. At surgery, the patients received dissection of thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes. Post-operative pathological studies were performed to identify regional lymph node involvement. All patients were under a 2- week observation after operation. Data on lymph node metastasis, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative mortality, complications and length of hospital stay between the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with the transhiatal group, the transthoracic group showed shorter operation time ( 2.6 ±0.8 ) b vs (4.7±1.1) b,P〈0. 05],less blood loss(418.5±112.5) mLvs (693.5 ±124.8) mL,P〈0. 05],less perioperative complications 5.9% ( 2/34 ) vs 22.5 % (9/40), P 〈 0.05 ] and shorter postoperative hospital days (15.5 +4.7) d vs (24.8 ± 6.5 )d, P 〈 0.05 ]. No statistical difference in lymph node metastasis was noted between the both groups ( P 〉0. 05 ). Conclusion: Transthoracic radical esophagectomy may lead to less operation-related injury and quicker recovery sooner, although the long-term survival rate with this surgical approach is yet to defined.
Keywords:esophageal neoplasms  digestive system surgical procedures  treatment outcome  retrospective studies
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号