Systematic comparison of radical vaginal trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer |
| |
Authors: | Ling Han Ai Zheng Li Wang Yu Wang |
| |
Affiliation: | a Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Cheng Du, Sichuan Province, Chinab Center of Chinese Evidence-based Medicine, Sichuan University, Cheng Du, Sichuan Province, China |
| |
Abstract: |
ObjectiveTo review the effects of radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) and radical hysterectomy (RH) on overall progression-free survival rate, and intraoperative and postoperative complications in patients with cervical cancer (FIGO stage IA-IB1).MethodsElectronic searches for studies of RVT and RH in the treatment of cervical cancer between 1994 and January 2010 were made on MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wan Fang dissertation database.ResultsNo significant differences were found between RVT and RH in 5-year overall survival rate (relative risk [RR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.02); 5-year progression-free survival rate (RR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.02); intraoperative complications (RR 1.99; 95% CI, 0.61-6.52)]; and postoperative complications (RR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.10-1.27). There were fewer blood transfusions (RR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90), less blood loss, and shorter hospital stays in patients undergoing RVT.ConclusionRadical vaginal trachelectomy should be considered as a viable treatment option for young patients with early cervical cancer (FIGO stage IA-IB1) who wish to preserve their fertility. |
| |
Keywords: | Cervical cancer Controlled trial Radical hysterectomy Radical vaginal trachelectomy |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|