Relationship Between Catheter Forces, Lesion Characteristics, Popping, and Char Formation: Experience with Robotic Navigation System |
| |
Authors: | LUIGI DI BIASE,M.D.,&dagger ,REA NATALE,M.D.,&Dagger ,§ ,CONOR BARRETT,M.D.,CARMELA TAN,M.D.,CLAUDE S. ELAYI,M.D.,CHI KEONG CHING,M.D.,PAUL WANG,M.D.,§ ,AMIN AL-AHMAD,M.D.,§ ,MAURICIO ARRUDA,M.D.,J. DAVID BURKHARDT,M.D.,BRIAN J. WISNOSKEY,Ph,.D.¶ ,PUNAM CHOWDHURY,M.D.,SHARI DE MARCO,R.N.,LUCIANA ARMAGANIJAN,M.D.,KENNETH N. LITWAK,M.D.,ROBERT A. SCHWEIKERT,M.D., JENNIFER E. CUMMINGS,M.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | From the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA;;Department of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy;;Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA;;Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA;;and Employee of Saint Jude Medical |
| |
Abstract: | Introduction: Popping, char and perforation are complications that can occur following catheter ablation. We measured the amount of grams (g) applied to the endocardium during ablation using a sensor incorporated in the long sheath of a robotic system. We evaluated the relationship between lesion formation, pressure, and the development of complications. Methods: Using a robotic navigation system, lesions were placed in the left atrium (LA) at six settings, using a constant duration (40 seconds) and flow rate of either 17 cc/min or 30 cc/min with an open irrigated catheter (OIC). Evidence of complications was noted and lesion location recorded for later analysis at necropsy. Results: Lesions using 30 Watts (W) were more likely to be transmural at higher (>40 g) than lower (<30 g) pressures (75% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of lesions using >40 g of pressure demonstrated popping and crater formation as compared with lesions with 20–30 g of pressure (41% vs 15%, P = 0.008). A majority of lesions placed using higher power (45 W) with higher pressures (>40 g) were associated with char and crater formation (66.7%). No lesions using 10 g of pressure were transmural, regardless of the power. Lesions placed with a power setting less than 35 W were more likely to result in relative sparing of the endocardial surface than lesions at a power setting higher than 35 W (62% vs 33.3%, P = 0.02) regardless of the pressure. Conclusions: When using an OIC, lower power settings (≤35 W) and lower/medium contact pressure were more likely to show a relative spared endocardial surface. Overall, contact pressure between 20 g and 30 g and a power setting of 40 W appeared to achieve transmurality by preserving safety. |
| |
Keywords: | char catheter ablation complications force sensors left atrium popping perforations remote robotic navigation |
|
|