首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Differenzielle und gemeinsame Merkmale bei Patienten mit atypischem Gesichtsschmerz und kraniomandibularer Dysfunktion
Authors:Priv.-Doz. Dr. Dr. A. Neff  A. Wolowski  P. Scheutzel  A. Kolk  K. H. Ladwig  A. Grübl  B. Marten-Mittag  M. Hammes  H.-H. Horch  H. Gündel
Affiliation:1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universit?t München, München, Germany
6. Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universit?t München, Ismaninger Stra?e 22, 81675, München, Germany
2. Abteilung für Prothetik, Poliklinik für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Westf?lische Wilhelms-Universit?t Münster, Münster, Germany
3. Institut und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin, Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universit?t München, Münster, Germany
5. Institut für Epidemiologie, GSF—Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, München-Neuherberg, Germany
4. Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universit?t München, Münster, Germany
Abstract:

Background

Craniomandibular disorders (CMD) and atypical facial pain (AFP) represent a clinical challenge. Whereas CMD patients respond to somatic approaches, somatization should be strictly avoided in AFP. The aim of this study was to establish prognostic criteria to identify an aggravated risk of a chronic course in CMD and AFP.

Method

A total of 124 consecutive patients with CMD (n=108) or AFP (n=16) were examined by two interdisciplinary academic pain centers. Psychometric evaluation was conducted with standardized questionnaires (SCL-90R, STAXI, modified SBAS-IV). All patients were clinically assessed by a maxillofacial surgeon or specialized dentist.

Results

The following variables proved to be significant: age (risk for AFP vs CMD increased by 6% p.a.), decreased dysfunction index (13% higher risk for AFP vs CMD), and low scores concerning outwardly directed anger (12% higher risk for AFP vs CMD). There was no correlation between initial pain intensity and somatic parameters of disease as assessed by the standardized clinical examination. Low educational status proved to be the best predictor (p<0.001) for patients presenting high initial pain with a marked discrepancy between somatic findings and subjective status.

Conclusions

CMD patients differ from AFP patients regarding age, psychosocial isolation, outwardly directed anger, and a decreased dysfunction index. Additionally, initial pain intensity in patients presenting indistinct CMD/AFP can be considered as a valid predictor for a chronic course in pain.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号