首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Prevalence of ventricular conduction blocks in the resting electrocardiogram in a general population: The Health 2000 Survey
Authors:Petri Haataja,Kjell Nikus,Mika Kä    nen,Heini Huhtala,Tuomo Nieminen,Antti Jula,Antti Reunanen,Veikko Salomaa,Samuel Sclarovsky,Markku S. Nieminen,Markku Eskola
Affiliation:1. Heart Centre, Department of Cardiology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland;2. Department of Clinical Physiology, Tampere University Hospital; and Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland;3. School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland;4. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland;5. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, Helsinki/Turku, Finland;6. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel;g University Central Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Helsinki, Finland;h Department of Internal Medicine, Päijät‐Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
Abstract:

Aims

The prevalence of eight different ventricular conduction blocks and their association with risk factors and major cardiovascular diseases were studied in a major Finnish population study.

Methods

Data, including 12-lead electrocardiograms, were collected from 6315 subjects. The prevalence of left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), non-specific ventricular block, incomplete LBBB, incomplete RBBB, R–R′-pattern, left anterior hemiblock (LAHB), and left posterior hemiblock (LPHB) was calculated for both genders in three age groups. Their association with risk factors and cardiovascular diseases was studied.

Results

R–R′-pattern was the most common ventricular conduction block in all age groups (3.9%, p < 0.001 for comparison between groups), but it showed no association with cardiovascular diseases. Males had more RBBB (1.5% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001), incomplete LBBB (1.8 vs. 0.4, p < 0.001) and non-specific ventricular block (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001).With increasing age (< 45 years vs. > 55 years) LBBB, RBBB and LAHB (0 vs. 2.2%, 0.3 vs. 2.2%, 0.2 vs. 1.9% respectively, p-values < 0.001) became more prevalent. LBBB, RBBB and non-specific ventricular conduction block were associated with coronary heart disease (angina pectoris in 28.3, 20.3 and 22.9%, respectively) and heart failure (25.0, 10.1 and 11.4%, respectively). LBBB and RBBB were also associated with peripheral vascular disease (8.8%).

Conclusions

Ventricular conduction blocks differ in prevalence between sexes and age groups. They also show disparate association with cardiovascular diseases. These differences need to be taken into consideration in everyday clinical practice.
Keywords:Ventricular conduction blocks   Incidence   General population
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号