Impact of thromboprophylaxis guidelines on clinical outcomes following total hip and total knee replacement |
| |
Authors: | Selby Rita Borah Bijan J McDonald Heather P Henk Henry J Crowther Mark Wells Philip S |
| |
Affiliation: | a Division of Hematology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadab Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USAc Bayer Inc., Toronto, Canadad OptumInsight (formerly i3Innovus), Eden Prairie, USAe Department of Hematology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canadaf Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines recommends thromboprophylaxis for total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) patients. We examined alignment with ACCP thromboprophylaxis guidelines among THR/TKR patients, and compared symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), bleeding event rates and risk factors for VTE between patients receiving ACCP-recommended thromboprophylaxis (‘ACCP’) and those who did not (‘non-ACCP’).MethodsThis retrospective observational study used a large US health plan claims database that was linked to an inpatient database containing detailed inpatient medication use and a database containing date-of-death information. Patients who had THR/TKR surgery between April 01, 2004 and December 31, 2006 were included. Comparisons of VTE and bleeding events between ACCP and non-ACCP patients were analyzed using chi-squared tests and multivariate logistic regression.ResultsOf 3,497 linked patients, 1,395 (40%) received ACCP recommended thromboprophylaxis. Of the patients who received non-ACCP recommended prophylaxis the majority (81%) received shorter than the recommended minimum 10 day prophylaxis and 118 (5.6%) of patients received no prophylaxis. Overall, non-ACCP patients were almost twice as likely to experience an incident DVT (3.76% versus 2.01%, p = 0.003) and more than eight times as likely to experience an incident PE (1.19% versus 0.14%, p = 0.001) relative to ACCP patients; there were no statistically significant difference in bleeding rates. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that the odds of a VTE event were significantly lower for ACCP patients (DVT: OR = 0.54; p = 0.006; PE: OR = 0.12; p = 0.004).ConclusionsThis study offers a unique perspective on ‘real-world’ thromboprophylaxis patterns and associated outcomes in THR and TKR patients in the US. It suggests that only 40% of THR/TKR patients receive ACCP-recommended thromboprophylaxis and that not receiving ACCP thromboprophylaxis is an independent risk factor for both DVT and PE. |
| |
Keywords: | ACCP, American College of Chest Physicians CI, confidence interval CM, clinical modification DVT, deep vein thrombosis GLORY, Global Orthopaedic Registry HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ICD, International Classification of Diseases LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin OR, odds ratio PE, pulmonary embolism THR, total hip replacement TKR, total knee replacement VKA, vitamin K antagonist VTE, venous thromboembolism |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|