|
|||||
|
|
Community-based distribution of misoprostol for treatment or prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: Cost-effectiveness, mortality, and morbidity reduction analysis |
|
| Authors: | Tori Sutherland Carinne Meyer Stacie Geller |
| Affiliation: | a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA b Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA c Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois, Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, USA |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of community-based distribution of misoprostol for prevention with misoprostol for treatment of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).MethodsA Monte Carlo simulation depicted mortality and anemia-related morbidity attributable to PPH among 3 scenarios of 10 000 women delivering at home in rural India: (1) standard management; (2) standard management plus 800 µg of sublingual misoprostol for PPH treatment; and (3) standard management plus 600 µg of prophylactic oral misoprostol. The model included costs of drugs, birth attendant training, and transport for women who did not respond to misoprostol.ResultsMisoprostol lowered mortality by 70% and 81% in scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. Scenarios 2 and 3 raise costs by 6% and 35%, respectively. Incremental cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) saved is estimated at $6 and $170, respectively.ConclusionBoth interventions were more effective at decreasing mortality and anemia than standard management. The most efficient scale-up plan would focus initially on increasing coverage with the treatment strategy ($6 per DALY). |
| Keywords: | Anemia Cost-effectiveness Maternal mortality Misoprostol Postpartum hemorrhage |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |