Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Coronary Slow Flow Syndrome: A Comparative Study |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran;2. Cardiologist, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran;3. Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran;4. Medical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran;5. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran;1. Miami Valley Hospital, Columbus, OH;2. Mount Sinai Morningside-West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY;3. University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS;4. Jacobi Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY;5. New York Medical College at Westchester Medical Center, New York City, NY;6. Maharaja Jitendra Narayan Medical College, West Bengal, India;1. Third Department of Cardiology, Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland;2. Department of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland;3. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL;4. Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL;1. Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE;2. Department of Clinical Research, Creighton University, Omaha, NE;3. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE;4. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Morningside and Beth Israel, New York, NY;5. Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC;6. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE;1. Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Science Center, Queen''s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada;2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen''s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada;3. Department of Cardiology and Heart Failure Clinic, Cardiovascular Clinic Santa Maria, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia;4. Division of Cardiology, Clínica Olivos, Buenos Aires, Argentina;5. Division of Cardiology, Hospital Italiano de la Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina;6. Guatemala Cardiovascular Services and Technology, Cardiosolutions, Guatemala City;7. Division of Cardiology, Sanatorio Guemes, Buenos Aires, Argentina;8. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, CIBERCV, Universidad Europea, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain;9. Tropical Cardiology, Tropical Medicine Institute, Central University of Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela;10. Department of Heart Failure, Pulmonary Hypertension and Heart Transplant, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina;11. Division of Cardiology, Kingston Health Science Center, Queen''s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada;1. Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA;2. Department of Medicine, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY;3. Mira Loma High School, Sacramento, CA;4. Department of Internal Medicine, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL;1. Department of Medicine, Tower Health System, West Reading, PA;2. Division of Cardiology, Reading Hospital-Tower Health, Reading, PA;3. Department of Medicine, AMITA Health Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, IL;4. Department of Medicine, Indiana Regional Medical Center, Indiana, PA |
| |
| Abstract: | The Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon is a syndrome of normal coronary anatomy and delayed progression of contrast medium through the coronary vessels. This research attempts to analyze and compare the systolic and diastolic function of the left and right ventricle in primary Slow Flow and Normal Coronary Flow.Two groups of primary Slow Coronary Flow (33 people) and Normal Coronary Flow (11 people) were included and the systolic and diastolic function of the ventricles was analyzed and compared between them.In the control group 18% of patients had mild and in the case group 24.2% mild, and 3.1% had moderate left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (P >0.05). The frequency distribution of the left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction was similar in the two groups.There was no statistically significant difference between two groups and in the association of cardiac dysfunction, it may be reasonable to investigate other causes. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
