Fracture toughness of conventional,milled and 3D printed denture bases

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine and compare fracture toughness (K_IC) and work of fracture (WOF) of a conventional (C) denture base, using the notchless triangular prism (NTP) specimen K_IC test, with CAD/CAM (milled, M) and 3D-printed (P) materials at 7 d and 90 d.MethodsLucitone 199 (C), Lucitone 199 CAD (M) and Lucitone Digital Print (P) (Dentsply, USA) were used to fabricate NTP specimens. Samples were stored in 37 °C water for 7 d (20/group) and 90 d (20/group) and conditioned in 23 °C water for 1 h prior to testing. For testing, samples were secured in custom-made jigs and loaded in tension until crack arrest/failure. The maximum-recorded load was used to calculate KIC. The results were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Scheffé multiple mean comparisons (α = 0.05), independent t-tests and Weibull. WOF (in KJ/m²) was calculated by dividing the area under the load-displacement graphs by twice the corresponding crack-arrested cross sectional area of the fractured surfaces.ResultsThe results have shown that: 1) the tested materials had significantly different K_IC (P > C > M; p < 0.005) and WOF at both 7d and 90d; 2) ageing in 37 ºC water for 90 d resulted in a significant decrease of K_IC in the C and M groups (p < 0.001) and of WOF in all groups.SignificanceThe tested P denture base exhibited significantly higher K_IC and WOF, suggesting that it could be more resistant to crack propagation than the C and M materials tested. Water storage for 90 d significantly decreased K_IC of C and M materials and WOF of all.