Performance comparison of two nucleic acid amplification systems for SARS‐CoV‐2 detection: A multi‐center study

BackgroundMany rapid nucleic acid testing systems have emerged to halt the development and spread of COVID‐19. However, so far relatively few studies have compared the diagnostic performance between these testing systems and conventional detection systems. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the clinical detection performance between SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid and conventional nucleic acid detection system.MethodsClinical detection results of 63,352 oropharyngeal swabs by both systems were finally enrolled in this analysis. Sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of both systems were calculated to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy. Concordance between these two systems were assessed by overall, positive, negative percent agreement (OPA, PPA, NPA) and κ value. Sensitivity of SARS‐CoV‐2 rapid nucleic acid detection system (Daan Gene) was further analyzed with respect to the viral load of clinical specimens.ResultsSensitivity of Daan Gene was slightly lower than that of conventional detection system (0.86 vs. 0.979), but their specificity was equivalent. Daan Gene had ≥98.0% PPV and NPV for SARS‐CoV‐2. Moreover, Daan Gene demonstrated an excellent test agreement with conventional detection system (κ = 0.893, p = 0.000). Daan Gene was 99.31% sensitivity for specimens with high viral load (C _t < 35) and 50% for low viral load (C _t ≥ 35).ConclusionsWhile showing an analytical sensitivity slightly below than that of conventional detection system, rapid nucleic acid detection system may be a diagnostic alternative to rapidly identify SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected individuals with high viral loads and a powerful complement to current detection methods.