Comparative hemodynamic and clinical effects of long-term treatment with prazosin and captopril for severe chronic congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy |
| |
Authors: | M Packer N Medina M Yushak |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Epidemiology, Health Policy and Health Management, Escuela Internacional de Doctorado Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain;2. Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain;3. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain;4. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBS), Granada, Spain;1. Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, Spain;2. Department of Personality, Assessment, and Clinical Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain;1. Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;2. International Society of Pharmacovigilance, London, United Kingdom;3. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom;4. Modelling and Economics Unit, National Infections Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom;5. School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;6. National Rare Diseases Registry System of China, Beijing, China;7. Rare Diseases Research Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China;8. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China;9. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;10. Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;11. Sau Po Centre on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;12. Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, Research Department of Policy and Practice, University College London School of Pharmacy and University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom;1. Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom;2. LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom;1. School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, UK;2. Centre for Sports Business, Salford Business School, University of Salford, UK;1. Department of Health Economics, Hanoi Medical University, Viet Nam;2. Department of Pharmaceutical Management and Pharmacoeconomics, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Viet Nam;3. North Center for Medical Review and Tertiary Care Payment, Vietnam Social Security, Viet Nam;4. Department of Endocrinology, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Viet Nam;5. Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam;6. Real-World Insights, IQVIA Asia-Pacific, Singapore |
| |
Abstract: | Short- and long-term hemodynamic and clinical responses to sequential therapy with prazosin (15 mg/day for 3 to 12 weeks) and captopril (75 to 300 mg/day for 2 to 15 weeks) were compared in 22 patients with severe chronic congestive heart failure. First doses of prazosin produced marked increases in cardiac index and stroke volume index (p less than 0.01), but these effects were lost during long-term treatment. First doses of captopril produced only modest increases in both variables, but these persisted without attenuation during prolonged therapy. Both drugs produced immediate decreases in left ventricular filling pressure, mean arterial pressure, mean right atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance; these changes became significantly attenuated (p less than 0.01) with prazosin but not with captopril. At the end of treatment, stroke volume index was significantly higher and right and left ventricular filling pressures were significantly lower with captopril than with prazosin (p less than 0.05 to 0.01). Only 8 of the 22 patients (36%) treated with prazosin benefited clinically, whereas 14 of 19 patients (74%) treated with captopril felt that they had improved (p less than 0.05). These differences could not have been predicted by comparing responses to first doses of the 2 drugs. These findings indicate that the choice of 1 vasodilator drug over another in patients with congestive heart failure should be based on studies that compare their long-term rather than short-term hemodynamic and clinical effects. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|