| Abstract: | ![]()
This article examines the efficacy of panoramic radiography alone and in combination with intraoral films as part of the "full-mouth" radiographic evaluation of asymptomatic dental patients in the diagnosis of dental caries and periodontal disease. Three full-mouth radiographic surveys--the panoramic alone, the panoramic plus posterior bitewing, and the periapical plus posterior bitewing--are compared. Two forms of measurement--comparative and incremental--were used to identify the radiographic survey with the highest single diagnostic yield when measured against the consensus standard. The findings show that the panoramic radiograph alone exhibits very low sensitivities to dental caries, ranging from 0.6% on anterior teeth to 25.6% on premolars. Even when posterior bitewing radiographs are added to the panoramic films, the sensitivities are significantly below those of the full-mouth periapical and bitewing survey. In contrast, the sensitivities of all three radiographic surveys in the diagnosis of periodontal disease are quite high, ranging from 87% to 96%, so that differences are not clinically significant. However, specificities tended to be low for periodontal disease and high for caries. Thus, for dental caries and (to a lesser extent) periodontal disease, the panoramic radiograph was inferior to the full-mouth intraoral series in its ability to correctly detect evidence of the disease. |
