The significance of histological diagnosis in renal allograft biopsies in 2014 |
| |
Authors: | Verena Broecker Michael Mengel |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK;2. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | In 2014, the renal allograft biopsy still represents the best available diagnostic ‘gold’ standard to assess reasons for allograft dysfunction. However, it is well recognized that histological lesion observed in the biopsy is of limited diagnostic specificity and that the Banff classification as the international diagnostic standard represents mere expert consensus. Here, we review the role of the renal allograft biopsy in different clinical and diagnostic settings. To increase diagnostic accuracy and to compensate for lack of specificity, the interpretation of biopsy pathology needs to be within the clinical context, primarily defined by time post‐transplantation and patient‐specific risk profile. With this in mind, similar histopathological patterns will lead to different conclusions with regard to diagnosis, disease grading and staging and thus to patient‐specific clinical decision‐making. Consensus generation for such integrated diagnostic approach, preferably including new molecular tools, represents the next challenge to the transplant community on its way to precision medicine in transplantation. |
| |
Keywords: | antibody‐mediated rejection Banff histopathology kidney biopsy transplantation |
|
|