两种蚊虫密度监测方法实验室及现场诱蚊效果观察

目的 观察光诱诱蚊灯法和CO2诱蚊灯法实验室及现场诱蚊效果,为蚊虫的合理监测提供依据.方法 光诱诱蚊灯法及CO2诱蚊灯法.结果 2种监测方法均有一定的诱蚊效果,光诱诱蚊灯法及CO2诱蚊灯法在实验室的捕虫率分别为45.33％和71.67％,现场监测捕获蚊虫密度为10.56和20.43只/(台,h),捕获蚊种均为淡色库蚊、中华按蚊和白纹伊蚊,雌雄性比分别是0.88∶1和4.57∶1.结论 2种监测方法均可用于蚊虫密度监测,监测时可根据监测目的及生境的不同,合理选择一种或多种监测方法,从而获得全面真实的监测数据.

Efficacy of two mosquito density monitoring methods in laboratory and field settings

Objective To compare the efficacy of light and CO2 trapping lamps in laboratory and field settings. Methods The methods of CO2 trapping lamp and light trapping lamp were used in this study. Results The two trapping lamps were both effective in attracting mosquitoes. The capture rates were 45.33% for light lamps and 71.67% for CO2 lamps in the laboratory, and the captured mosquito density was 10.56/lamp. hour and 20.43/lamp. hour, respectively. Culex pipiens pallens, Anopheles sinensis and Aedes albopictus were collected with a female-to-male ratio of 0.88 ： 1 and 4.57 ： 1 using the two methods, respectively. Conclusion Both trapping lamps could be used alone or in combination for accurate mosquito monitoring dependent on the habitat and purposes.