Evaluation of two commercially available carbon dioxide sampling nasal cannulae

Our study compared two commercially available carbon dioxide sampling nasal cannulae for efficacy of oxygenation and relationship of end-tidal carbon dioxide (Petco ₂) to arterial carbon dioxide (Paco₂). The two-prong nasal cannula (2PNC) has one prong dedicated to delivering O₂ via one naris and the second prong dedicated to sampling exhaled gases via the other naris. The four-prong nasal cannula (4PNC) delivers O₂ via a prong in each naris, and samples exhaled gases via another set of prongs in each naris. Forty six patients were divided into three groups, which received either 2 (n = 15), 3 (n = 16), or 4(n = 15) L/min O₂, respectively, and were studied sequentially with standard nasal cannula (SNC), the 2PNC, and then the 4PNC. At each O₂ flow rate, Pao₂ was equivalent regardless of whether the SNC, 2PNC, or 4PNC was used. Seventy-four percent (34/46) of the 2PNC and 0% (0/46) of the 4PNCPetco2 values were within ±4 torr of the Paco₂ value. The authors conclude that the 2PNC and 4PNC are equally effective compared with an SNC in oxygenating patients, but thePetco2 measured by the 2PNC provides a superior quantitative estimate of the Paco₂ than that obtained by the 4PNC.