首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Does the Suggested Lightwand Bent Length Fit Every Patient?: The Relation between Bent Length and Patient's Thyroid Prominence-to-Mandibular Angle Distance
Authors:Chen  Tsai-Hsin MD; Tsai  Shen-Kou MD  PhD&#x;; Lin  Chen-Jung MD&#x;; Lu  Cheng-Wei MD ; Tsai  Tsung-Po MD  PhD&#x;; Sun  Wei-Zen MD&#x;
Institution:Chen, Tsai-Hsin M.D.*; Tsai, Shen-Kou M.D., Ph.D.†; Lin, Chen-Jung M.D.‡; Lu, Cheng-Wei M.D.§; Tsai, Tsung-Po M.D., Ph.D.∥; Sun, Wei-Zen M.D.‡
Abstract:Background: To date, no study has explored the effect of bent length on lightwand intubation. For successful intubation in daily practice, the authors found that bent length should be approximated to the patient's thyroid prominence-to-mandibular angle distance (TMD), but some patients have a TMD much shorter than the suggested bent length range. The purposes of this study were to understand TMD distribution in adults and to test the influence of bent length on lightwand intubation.

Methods: The TMD, airway, and demographic data of 379 patients were collected. To test the bent length influence, patients were enrolled in group A (158 patients, TMD <= 5.5 cm) and group B (131 patients, TMD > 5.5 cm) and were intubated randomly using the lower (6.5 cm) and upper (8.5 cm) limits of the suggested range. Success rate and lightwand search time were compared.

Results: In group A, the success rate was 98.8% with 6.5-cm bent length and 78.2% with 8.5-cm bent length (P < 0.05). Search times were 5.7 +/- 2.90 and 8.9 +/- 5.80 s with 6.5- and 8.5-cm bent length, respectively (P < 0.01). In group B, there was no statistical difference in success rate and search time between 6.5- and 8.5-cm bent length.

Keywords:
点击此处可从《The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号