International recommendations for training future toxicologic pathologists participating in regulatory-type,nonclinical toxicity studies |
| |
Authors: | Brad Bolon Erio Barale-Thomas Alys Bradley Robert A. Ettlin Carla A.S. Franchi Catherine George Anna Maria Giusti Robert Hall Matthew Jacobsen Yoichi Konishi David Ledieu Daniel Morton Jae-Hak Park Cheryl L. Scudamore Hiroyuki Tsuda S.K. Vijayasarathi Marcel V.W. Wijnands |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. GEMpath Inc., Longmont, CO, USA;2. Johnson and Johnson PRD, Beerse, Belgium;3. Charles River Laboratories, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK;4. Ettlin Consulting Ltd., Muenchenstein, Switzerland;5. UNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brazil;6. Ipsen, Les Ulis, France;7. Accelera, Nerviano, Italy;8. Covance Laboratories, Madison, WI, USA;9. AstraZeneca, Cheshire, UK;10. Sakai, Osaka, Japan;11. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland;12. Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA;13. Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;14. Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK;15. Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan;p. Advinus Therapeutics Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India;q. Merck Sharp & Dohme, Oss, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | The International Federation of Societies of Toxicologic Pathologists (IFSTP) proposes a common global framework for training future toxicologic pathologists who will support regulatory-type – nonclinical toxicology studies. Trainees optimally should undertake a scientific curriculum of at least 5 years at an accredited institution leading to a clinical degree (veterinary medicine or medicine). Trainees should then obtain 4 or more years of intensive pathology practice during a residency and/or on-the-job "apprenticeship," at least 2 years of which must be focused on regulatory-type toxicologic pathology topics. Possession of a recognized pathology qualification (i.e., certification) is highly recommended. A nonclinical pathway (e.g., a graduate degree in medical biology or pathology) may be possible if medically trained pathologists are scarce, but this option is not optimal. Regular, lifelong continuing education (peer review of nonclinical studies, professional meetings, reading, short courses) will be necessary to maintain and enhance one's understanding of current toxicologic pathology knowledge, skills, and tools. This framework should provide a rigorous yet flexible way to reliably train future toxicologic pathologists to generate, interpret, integrate, and communicate data in regulatory-type, nonclinical toxicology studies. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|