首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

急性白血病的抗原表达及其临床意义
引用本文:朱焕玲 牛挺 等. 急性白血病的抗原表达及其临床意义[J]. 华西医科大学学报, 2002, 33(1): 118-120
作者姓名:朱焕玲 牛挺 等
摘    要:
目的:探讨成人急性白血病(AL)的抗原表达及其临床意义。方法:采用直接免疫荧光法标记,流式细胞仪检测分析69例AL的免疫表型,结果:(1)29例成人急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)髓系抗原阳性表达率为30%,其中CD13为20.7%,CD33为10.3%,T-ALL和B-AL 系抗表达无显著性差异(P=0.367);CD34表达阳性的ALL髓系抗原表达率明显高于CD34表达阴性的ALL髓系抗原表达率(77.8%vs13.3%,P=0.036);ALL髓系抗原阳性表达的CR率明显低于髓系抗原阴性表达的CR率(33.3%vs80%,P=0.0203);(2)40例急性髓性白血病(AML)淋系抗原表达率为30%,其中CD7为15%,CD19为12.5%,CD2为2.5%,CD7主要分布在M1,M2亚型中,CD34阳性AML的淋系抗原表达率明显高于CD34阴性AML的淋系抗原表达率(61.1%vs4.5%,P=0.000125);AML淋系抗原阳性表达的CR率低于淋系抗原阴性表达的CR率,但差异无显著性(50%vs 71.4%,P=0.126),结论:成人AL的抗原错译表达率约为30%,CD34阳性AL的抗原错译表达率明显高于CD34阴性AL的抗原错译表达率,有抗原错译表达的AL的CR率低于无抗原错译表达的AL和CR率。

关 键 词:急性白血病 抗原 免疫表型 错译表达

Immunophenotype of acute leukemia and its clinical significance]
Huanling Zhu,Ting Niu,Wentong Meng,Caigang Xu,Song Lei. Immunophenotype of acute leukemia and its clinical significance][J]. Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences, 2002, 33(1): 118-120
Authors:Huanling Zhu  Ting Niu  Wentong Meng  Caigang Xu  Song Lei
Affiliation:Department of Hemotology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the immunophenotype of adult acute leukemia and analyze its clinical significance. METHODS: Immunophenotypes were examined by direct immunofluorescence method and flowcytometry in 69 de novo AL. RESULTS: 1. The incidence of myeloid antigen expression in 29 adult ALL was 30%. Among them, CD13 was 10.3% and CD33 was 20.7%, no difference was found in expression of myeloid antigens between B-ALL and T-ALL (P > 0.05). Myeloid antigens were expressed much more higher in CD34 positive ALL than in CD34 negative ALL (77.8% vs 13.3%, P = 0.036). CR rate in myeloid antigen positive ALL was lower than in myeloid antigen negative ALL (33.3% vs 80%, P = 0.0203). 2. The incidence of lymphoid antigen expression in 40 adult AML was 30%. Among them, CD7 was 15%, CD19 12.5% and CD2 2.5%. CD7 was mainly expressed in M1 and M2 subtypes. Lymphoid antigens were expressed higher in CD34 positive AML than in CD34 negative AML (61.1% vs 4.5%, P = 0.000125). Though CR rate was lower in lymphoid antigen positive AML than in lymphoid antigen negative AML, no significant difference between them was noted (50% vs 71.4%, P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: Aberrant antigen expression in adult acute leukemia is about 30%. Antigen aberrant is much higher in CD34 positive AL than in CD34 negative AL. The CR rate of antigen aberrant AL is lower than that of usual AL.
Keywords:
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号