首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

2009年国际妇产科联盟子宫内膜癌分期标准对磁共振成像分期诊断价值的影响
作者姓名:Yu XD  Ouyang H  Lin M  Zhou CW  Zhang R
作者单位:1. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院影像诊断科,100021
2. 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院妇瘤科,100021
摘    要:目的 分析2009年国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期的变化,探讨新版分期标准下磁共振成像(MRI)对子宫内膜癌的诊断价值。方法 分析63例经术后病理证实的子宫内膜癌初治患者的MRI 资料,对比在2009和1988年FIGO分期标准下,MRI对各期子宫内膜癌的诊断价值。结果 2009年FIGO分期中,将肿瘤局限于内膜和侵犯深度<1/2肌层合并为Ⅰa期;将侵犯深度>1/2肌层重新定义为Ⅰb期;仅有宫颈腺体受累归为Ⅰ期;删除了腹水或腹腔冲洗液中有癌细胞这一分期标准。以1988年FIGO分期为标准,MPI对Ⅰa期、Ⅰb期、Ⅰc期、Ⅰ期、Ⅱa期、Ⅱb期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲa期、Ⅲb期、Ⅲc 期、Ⅲ期和Ⅳb期诊断的准确率分别为95.2%、79.4%、81.0%、84.1%、96.8%、90.5%、90.5%、92.1%、98.4%、92.1%、82.5%和98.4%。以2009年FIGO分期为标准,MR]对Ⅰa期、Ib期、I期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲa期、Ⅲb期、Ⅲc期、Ⅲ期和Ⅳb期诊断的准确率分别为88.9%、81.0%、88.9%、92.1%、98.4%、98.4%、92.1%、88.9%和98.4%。结论2009年FIGO分期标准在1988年FIGO分期的基础上进行简化,使MRI评价Ⅰ~Ⅲ期子宫内膜癌的准确率有不同程度地提高,并进一步增加了子宫内膜癌术前分期的可靠性。

关 键 词:子宫内膜癌  磁共振成像  国际妇产科联盟  肿瘤分期  诊断

Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma
Yu XD,Ouyang H,Lin M,Zhou CW,Zhang R.Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Oncology,2011,33(9):692-696.
Authors:Yu Xiao-duo  Ouyang Han  Lin Meng  Zhou Chun-wu  Zhang Rong
Institution:Department of Imaging Diagnosis, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Abstract:Objective To analyze the changes of 2009 FIGO staging system compared with the 1988 FIGO staging system of endometrial carcinoma and evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI staging by the 2009 FIGO criteria. Methods A retrospective study was performed on 63 consecutive patients with pathologically confinmed endometrial carcinoma who were treated by surgery initially from January to December 2009. The diagnostic value of preoperative MRI by the 2009 FIGO staging system was compared with that using the 1988 FIGO system, respectively. Results According to the 2009 FIGO staging system of endometfial carcinoma,stage Ia was defined as no or less than half myometrial invasion, which included stage Ia ( confined to endometrium) and stage Ⅰ b ( invasion less than half of the myometrium) of the 1988 FIGO staging system.Stage Ⅰ b assessed by the 2009 FIGO system was the same as the stage Ⅰ c of 1988 FIGO system, indicating the lesions more than haft myometrial invasion. Endocervical glandular involvement only (stage Ⅱ a of 1988 FIGO system) was classified as stage Ⅰ . Positive cytology of ascites (stage Ⅲa of 1988 FIGO system) was excluded by the 2009 FIGO criteria. Using the 1988 FIGO system, the accuracy of MRI for the evaluation of endometrial carcinoma of stage Ⅰ a, Ⅰ b, Ⅰ c, whole stage Ⅰ , Ⅱ a, Ⅱ b, whole stage Ⅱ , Ⅲ a, Ⅲ b,Ⅲ c, whole stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ b were 95.2%, 79.4%, 81.0%, 84.1%, 96.8 %, 90.5 %, 90.5 %, 92.1%,98.4%, 92. 1%, 82.5%, and 98.4%, respectively, while using the 2009 FIGO system, the accuracy of MRI of stage Ⅰ a, Ⅰ b, whole stage Ⅰ , Ⅱ, Ⅲa, ⅢⅢb, Ⅲe, whole stage Ⅲ and Ⅳb were 88.9%,81.0%, 88.9%, 92. 1%, 98.4%, 98.4%, 92. 1%, 88.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Conclusions The 2009 FIGO staging system is simplified on the basis of the 1988 FIGO system. It gives an improved accuracy of MRI in evaluating the stage Ⅰ to Ⅲ endometrial carcinoma.
Keywords:Endometrial carcinoma  Magnetic resonance imaging  International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics  Neoplasm staging  Diagnosis
本文献已被 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号