首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

XVI锥形束CT辐射剂量与扫描参数相关性建模
引用本文:李正贤,赵晶晶,王美娇,周莉,刘东,王博生,宗少飞,马竟超,张艺宝. XVI锥形束CT辐射剂量与扫描参数相关性建模[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2017, 37(8): 618-622
作者姓名:李正贤  赵晶晶  王美娇  周莉  刘东  王博生  宗少飞  马竟超  张艺宝
作者单位:136100 公主岭, 吉林国文医院放疗科,136100 公主岭, 吉林国文医院放疗科,100142 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所放疗科 恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,610041 成都, 四川大学华西医院肿瘤中心 生物治疗国家重点实验室 放射物理技术中心,136100 公主岭, 吉林国文医院放疗科,136100 公主岭, 吉林国文医院放疗科,136100 公主岭, 吉林国文医院放疗科,136100 公主岭, 吉林国文医院放疗科,100142 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所放疗科 恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(11505012);北京市自然科学基金(7172048,1174016);北京市医院管理局"青苗"计划专项经费(QML20151004);质检公益性行业科研专项(201510001-02)
摘    要:目的 定量研究不同扫描参数组合导致的医科达XVI锥形束CT辐射剂量变化,为评估影像引导放疗中成像剂量的参数依赖性提供数学模型。方法 基于Versa HD加速器XVI,利用PTW 30 009千伏电离室和UNIDOS webline静电计,在PTW标准CT剂量指数(CTDI)体部模体中,测量标准扫描参数及多种扫描电压(kVp)、管电流(mA)组合下的模体内各点比释动能,并计算加权CTDIw。利用SigmaPlot 10.0软件将测量结果拟合为以管电流和/或扫描电压为变量的模型。结果 标准扫描参数下,瓦里安OBI锥形束CT的CTDIw值仅为医科达XVI的11.23%(胸部参数)和9.15%(盆腔参数)。在标准及其余4个扫描电压条件下,模体中心和外周各点比释动能与管电流均呈现线性正比关系,但斜率a值差异较大(0.479~6.679),主要受扫描电压值、模体测量位置、剂量描述方法等因素影响。模体内各点剂量和CTDIw值均可拟合为以扫描电压为变量的非线性经验公式(R2>0.997),各系数差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同时改变管电流和扫描电压对模体中心点剂量的影响可以表述为mGy=(5.917-0.197×kVp+0.002×kVp2-5.063×10-6×kVp3)×mA。结论 医科达XVI锥形束CT剂量显著依赖于扫描参数,数学模型可用于快速准确描述其变化特征。

关 键 词:锥形束CT  XVI  辐射剂量  放射防护  影像引导放疗
收稿时间:2017-02-07

Modeling the correlations between radiation dose and scanning parameters of XVI cone beam CT
Li Zhengxian,Zhao Jingjing,Wang Meijiao,Zhou Li,Liu Dong,Wang Bosheng,Zong Shaofei,Ma Jingchao and Zhang Yibao. Modeling the correlations between radiation dose and scanning parameters of XVI cone beam CT[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2017, 37(8): 618-622
Authors:Li Zhengxian  Zhao Jingjing  Wang Meijiao  Zhou Li  Liu Dong  Wang Bosheng  Zong Shaofei  Ma Jingchao  Zhang Yibao
Affiliation:Department of Radiation Oncology, Gongzhuling Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136100, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gongzhuling Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136100, China,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research(Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China,Division of Radiation Physics, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gongzhuling Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136100, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gongzhuling Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136100, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gongzhuling Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136100, China,Department of Radiation Oncology, Gongzhuling Guowen Hospital, Gongzhuling 136100, China and Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research(Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
Abstract:Objective To quantify the correlations between Elekta XVI cone beam CT dose and various scanning protocols, providing mathematical models to assess the protocol-dependency of imaging dose during image guided radiotherapy. Methods Based on standard protocols and various combinations of kVp and mA on an XVI mounted on an Elekta Versa HD accelerator, the air KERMA was measured at various positions in a standard PTW CTDI body phantom using calibrated PTW 30009 kV chamber and UNIDOS webline electrometer. Weighted CT dose index (CTDIw) was computed thereafter. SigmaPlot 10.0 was used to fit the measurements against mA and/or kVp yielding empirical functions. Results Under standard protocols, the CTDIw of Varian OBI was only 11.23% (chest) and 9.15% (pelvis) of Elekta XVI. Using the default and other 4 investigated kVp values, the central and peripheral KERMA were both proportional to mA, and yet the slope value a varied dramatically from 0.479 to 6.679. Major affecting factors included kVp settings, measurement locations, and dosimetric metrics, etc. None linear regressions were used to fit kVp against KERMA at various locations and CTDIw (R2>0.997). The differences between all coefficients were statistically significant (P<0.05). The impact of changing both mA and kVp on the dose to phantom center can be described as mGy=(5.917 -0.197×kVp+0.002×kVp2-5.063×10-6×kVp3)×mA. Conclusions Imaging dose of Elekta XVI is strongly dependent on scanning parameters. The proposed mathematical models can be used as efficient and robust indicators of such dependency.
Keywords:Cone beam CT  Elekta XVI  Radiation dose  Radiological protection  Image guided radiotherapy
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号