Clinical, rhinomanometric, and cytologic evaluation of seasonal allergic rhinitis treated with beclomethasone dipropionate as aqueous nasal spray or pressurized aerosol |
| |
Authors: | H. Alice Orgel M.D. Ph.D. Eli O. Meltzer M.D. James P. Kemp M.D. Michael J. Welch M.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary;2. Goodwill Pharma Ltd., Szeged, Hungary;3. Department of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary;4. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary;1. Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal;2. CNC – Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal;3. CICS-UBI – Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Rua Marquês d''Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal;1. MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom;2. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA;3. Avenir Health, Glastonbury, Connecticut, USA;4. Bureau for Global Health, Infectious Diseases Division, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA;5. Stop TB Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | The currently available beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) metered-dose nasal aerosol spray is considered uncomfortable by some patients because of the force of delivery. It was compared for efficacy and acceptability in a double-blind study with a new aqueous suspension BDP spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in 44 symptomatic patients aged 12 to 43 years. After 7 days of baseline evaluation, every patient was given both an aerosol canister and an aqueous spray bottle each containing either BDP, 42 mcg per spray, or placebo (P). For 15 days the patient sprayed each nostril twice a day with one spray of suspension (BDP or P) followed 5 minutes later by one spray of aerosol (P or BDP). Patients were evaluated before the study medications were started (day 1) and on days 4, 8, and 15 for nasal and eye symptoms. Nasal cytologic specimens were examined on days 1 and 15, and rhinomanometry was performed on days 1, 8, and 15 of the study. Topical BDP by both methods of delivery was rapidly effective in decreasing mean nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching symptoms as well as mean eye symptoms with no statistically significant differences between them. Nasal airflow increased with both treatments; rhinomanometry significantly correlated with subjective nasal obstruction scores. Of 34 patients with nasal eosinophils, 74% had fewer eosinophils after treatment. Most patients (84%) preferred the aqueous spray over the pressurized aerosol. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|