The impact of intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation on in-hospital mortality in patients presenting with anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock |
| |
Authors: | Michael Mahmoudi Camille Hauville Michael A. Gaglia Gabriel Sardi Rebecca Torguson Zhenyi Xue Lowell F. Satler William O. Suddath Augusto D. Pichard Ron Waksman |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent''s Hospital, Sydney, Australia;2. Department of Gastroenterology, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia;3. Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK;4. Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia;5. Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Brisbane and Women''s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia;6. IBD Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston Campus, Brisbane, Australia;7. Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia;8. National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;9. Department of Gastroenterology, St George Hospital, St George Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia;10. Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine whether the elective insertion of an intra-aortic balloon counter pulsation (IABP) device at the time of myocardial revascularization in patients presenting with an acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without cardiogenic shock has any impact on the in-hospital rate of cardiac mortality.BackgroundThe role of IABP in patients presenting with an acute MI without cardiogenic shock remains ill defined.MethodsThe present study comprised 605 consecutive patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for an anterior STEMI without cardiogenic shock. Patients who received IABP at the time of their coronary revascularization (n = 105) were compared to those who had not (n = 500). Patients with stable angina, unstable angina, non-STEMI, non-anterior STEMI, and cardiogenic shock were excluded.ResultsThe two cohorts were well matched for the conventional risk factors for coronary artery disease. Although the left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in the patients who received IABP (0.32 ± 0.11 vs. 0.39 ± 0.12; P < 0.001), the two cohorts were well matched for history of MI, coronary revascularization, and chronic renal impairment. Following propensity scoring, the in-hospital rate of cardiac death was similar between the two cohorts (5.6% vs. 0%; P = .12) as was the rate of vascular complications. Major bleeding was significantly greater in the IABP cohort (10.0% vs. 0%; P = .01) leading to a greater transfusion requirement (14.9% vs. 2.9%; P = .01).ConclusionThe adjunctive use of an IABP in patients presenting with an acute anterior STEMI without cardiogenic shock may not be associated with an in-hospital mortality benefit. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|