Patients Report Better Satisfaction with Part-Time Primary Care Physicians,Despite Less Continuity of Care and Access |
| |
Authors: | Laura Panattoni Ashley Stone Sukyung Chung Ming Tai-Seale |
| |
Affiliation: | Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 2350 W. El Camino Real, Mountain View, CA 94040 USA |
| |
Abstract: |
BACKGROUNDThe growing number of primary care physicians (PCPs) reducing their clinical work hours has raised concerns about meeting the future demand for services and fulfilling the continuity and access mandates for patient-centered care. However, the patient’s experience of care with part-time physicians is relatively unknown, and may be mediated by continuity and access to care outcomes.OBJECTIVEWe aimed to examine the relationships between a physicians’ clinical full-time equivalent (FTE), continuity of care, access to care, and patient satisfaction with the physician.DESIGNWe used a multi-level structural equation estimation, with continuity and access modeled as mediators, for a cross-section in 2010.PARTICIPANTSThe study included family medicine (n = 104) and internal medicine (n = 101) physicians in a multi-specialty group practice, along with their patient satisfaction survey responses (n = 12,688).MAIN MEASURESPhysician level FTE, continuity of care received by patients, continuity of care provided by physician, and a Press Ganey patient satisfaction with the physician score, on a 0–100 % scale, were measured. Access to care was measured as days to the third next-available appointment.KEY RESULTSPhysician FTE was directly associated with better continuity of care received (0.172 % per FTE, p < 0.001), better continuity of care provided (0.108 % per FTE, p < 0.001), and better access to care (−0.033 days per FTE, p < 0.01), but worse patient satisfaction scores (−0.080 % per FTE, p = 0.03). The continuity of care provided was a significant mediator (0.016 % per FTE, p < 0.01) of the relationship between FTE and patient satisfaction; but overall, reduced clinical work hours were associated with better patient satisfaction (−0.053 % per FTE, p = 0.03).CONCLUSIONSThese results suggest that PCPs who choose to work fewer clinical hours may have worse continuity and access, but they may provide a better patient experience. Physician workforce planning should consider these care attributes when considering the role of part-time PCPs in practice redesign efforts and initiatives to meet the demand for primary care services.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3104-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.KEY WORDS: part-time work, continuity of care, access to care, patient satisfaction |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|