首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

医护合作型分级护理决策模式实践
引用本文:袁文清,时咏梅,位兰玲,王玉玲. 医护合作型分级护理决策模式实践[J]. 中国护理管理, 2013, 0(2): 105-107
作者姓名:袁文清  时咏梅  位兰玲  王玉玲
作者单位:[1]青岛市市立医院集团护理部,山东省266071 [2]青岛市市立医院,山东省266071
摘    要:
目的:探讨责任护士参与的医护合作型分级护理决策模式的实践及效果。方法:采用便利取样法,将2011年1-6月在某三级医院骨外科病区住院的67例患者设为常规组,7-12月住院的62例患者设为合作组,常规组采用传统方法由医生根据患者病情进行护理分级,合作组采用医护合作型分级护理决策模式进行护理分级,即由责任护士采用Barthel指数量表对患者进行评分,医生基于评分结果,确定患者护理级别。结果:常规组与合作组医嘱护理分级结果有统计学差异妒〈0.05);合作组护理质量评价指标及患者满意度与常规组相比有统计学差异(P〈0.05)。结论:医护合作型分级护理决策模式可提高护理分级的科学性、合理性,提高护理质量及患者满意度。

关 键 词:医护合作  分级护理  模式  Barthel指数量表  生活自理能力

The practice of physician-nurse collaboration nursing grading decision-making model
Affiliation:YUAN Wen-qing, SHI Yong-mei, Lan-ling, et al( Nursing Department, Qingdao Municipal Hospital (Group), Shangdong province, 266071 china)
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the practice and effect of physician-nurse collaboration nursing grading decision-making model. Methods: Totally 9 doctors, 11 nurses and 129 patients in Department of Orthopedics in a tertiary general hospital were divided into physician-nurse collaboration nursing grading decision-making model group (PN-group) and the conventional nursing grading group (CN-group) from January 2011 to January 2012. Nurses and doctors consulted the patients' nursing grading according to Barthel' index and the actual self-care ability of patients in PN-group.Results: CN-group and PN-group's nursing grading were significantly different (P〈0.05). Nursing quality evaluation index and patients' satisfaction of PN-group were significantly better than those of CN-group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Physician-nurse collaboration nursing grading decision-making model could obviously improve the scientificity and rationality of nursing grading and enhance the nursing quality and patients' satisfaction.
Keywords:physician-nurse collaboration  grading nursing  model  Barthel' index  self-care ability
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号