首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Feasibility of self-expandable metallic stent plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis
Authors:Takaya Shimura  Hiromi Kataoka  Makoto Sasaki  Tomonori Yamada  Kazuki Hayashi  Shozo Togawa  Fumihiro Okumura  Eiji Kubota  Hirotaka Ohara   Takashi Joh
Affiliation:Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya,;Department of Gastroenterology, Iwata Municipal Hospital, Iwata,;Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya,;Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural Tajimi Hospital, Tajimi, and;Department of Gastroenterology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Japan
Abstract:Background and Aim:  Self-expandable metallic stent placement is accepted as palliative therapy for advanced gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction, but data are lacking for chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent insertion. This study retrospectively compared results between surgery plus chemotherapy and stenting plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis.
Methods:  Subjects comprised 26 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery or endoscopic stenting for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis between April 2000 and December 2007 in four Japanese hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups: 15 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery for pyloric stenosis (Surgery group); and 11 patients who received chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent placement for pyloric stenosis (Stent group).
Results:  Median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 284 days and 226 days in the Surgery group and 337 days and 247 days in the Stent group, respectively. No significant differences were noted between survival and time to treatment failure. No significant differences were found in median oral intake rate (Surgery, 93.1%; Stent, 93.2%) or median hospital stay rate (Surgery, 24.6%; Stent, 23.7%) during survival. Response rate was 45.5% in the Surgery group and 50% in the Stent group, with no significant difference. Likewise, no significant differences were noted between groups for frequencies of toxicity or complications.
Conclusions:  The present results suggest that chemotherapy after stenting is as effective and safe as chemotherapy after surgery. Stents may replace surgery in combination therapy with chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction.
Keywords:chemotherapy    gastric cancer    gastric outlet obstruction    stents
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号