首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Cerebral palsy in Victoria: motor types, topography and gross motor function
Authors:Howard Jason  Soo Brendan  Graham H Kerr  Boyd Roslyn N  Reid Sue  Lanigan Anna  Wolfe Rory  Reddihough Dinah S
Affiliation:Royal Children's Hospital, Departments of Orthopaedics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;, Royal Children's Hospital, Departments of Neonatology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;, and Royal Children's Hospital, Departments of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;, Departments of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;, and Epidemiology and Preventitive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Abstract:Objectives:   To study the relationships between motor type, topographical distribution and gross motor function in a large, population-based cohort of children with cerebral palsy (CP), from the State of Victoria, and compare this cohort to similar cohorts from other countries.
Methods:   An inception cohort was generated from the Victorian Cerebral Palsy Register (VCPR) for the birth years 1990–1992. Demographic information, motor types and topographical distribution were obtained from the register and supplemented by grading gross motor function according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS).
Results:   Complete data were obtained on 323 (86%) of 374 children in the cohort. Gross motor function varied from GMFCS level I (35%) to GMFCS level V (18%) and was similar in distribution to a contemporaneous Swedish cohort. There was a fairly even distribution across the topographical distributions of hemiplegia (35%), diplegia (28%) and quadriplegia (37%) with a large majority of young people having the spastic motor type (86%).
Conclusions:   The VCPR is ideal for population-based studies of gross motor function in children with CP. Gross motor function is similar in populations of children with CP in developed countries but the comparison of motor types and topographical distribution is difficult because of lack of consensus with classification systems. Use of the GMFCS provides a valid and reproducible method for clinicians to describe gross motor function in children with CP using a universal language.
Keywords:cerebral palsy    classification system    gross motor function    motor skills    motor type    population register    topographical distribution
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
正在获取引用信息,请稍候...
正在获取相似文献,请稍候...
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号