Evaluation of the Essential Oil of Foeniculum Vulgare Mill (Fennel) Fruits Extracted by Three Different Extraction Methods by GC/MS |
| |
Authors: | Faiza M Hammouda Mahmoud A Saleh Nahla S Abdel-Azim Khaled A Shams Shams I Ismail Abdelaaty A Shahat Ibrahim A Saleh |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Phytochemistry, National Research Centre (NRC), 12622 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt;2.Department of Chemistry, Texas Southern University, 3100 Cleburne Ave, Houston, TX 77004, USA |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundHydrodistillation (HD) and steam-distillation, or solvent extraction methods of essential oils have some disadvantages like thermal decomposition of extracts, its contamination with solvent or solvent residues and the pollution of residual vegetal material with solvent which can be also an environmental problem. Thus, new green techniques, such as supercritical fluid extraction and microwave assisted techniques, are potential solutions to overcome these disadvantages.Materials and MethodsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the essential oil of Foeniculum vulgare subsp. Piperitum fruits extracted by three different extraction methods viz. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) using CO2, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and hydro-distillation (HD) using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS).ResultsThe results revealed that both MAE and SFE enhanced the extraction efficiency of the interested components. MAE gave the highest yield of oil as well as higher percentage of Fenchone (28%), whereas SFE gave the highest percentage of anethol (72%).ConclusionMicrowave-assisted extraction (MAE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) not only enhanced the essential oil extraction but also saved time, reduced the solvents use and produced, ecologically, green technologies. |
| |
Keywords: | Foeniculum vulgare subsp. Piperitum microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) Essential Oils Anethol Fenchone Limonene Pinene GC/MS |
|
|