Clinical and Budget Impact of Treating Preoperative Anemia in Major Orthopedic Surgery—A Retrospective Observational Study

BackgroundPreoperative anemia (POA) in elective surgery is associated with worse outcome. In this retrospective study, in elective hip and knee arthroplasties, the prevalence of POA and its associations with outcome were analyzed, followed by a model estimating the budget impact of screening and treatment of POA.MethodsAll elective hip/knee arthroplasties performed during the period 2016-2018 were included. Patients with normal hemoglobin and patients with POA (hemoglobin < 13.0 g/dL in men and <12.0 g/dL in women) were compared. Outcome measures were allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT), length of stay (LOS), complications, mortality, and costs. The budget impact of screening for POA and treatment with intravenous iron when relevant was modeled based on the results of the costs related to POA.ResultsIn 881 procedures, the prevalence of POA was 21.5%. POA independently predicted increased risks of ABT (odds ratio OR]_adj, 9.5 confidence interval—CI, 6.4-13.9]), prolonged LOS (OR_adj, 2.8 CI, 1.8-4.2]), and was associated with increased complications (OR_adj, 1.9 CI, 0.7-4.9]) and mortality (OR_adj, 3.2 CI, 0.8-13.5]). POA resulted in increased costs per patient (P < .001). The budget impact model showed a cost reduction of 254 euros per patient based on the assumption that patients screened and treated for iron-deficient anemia would have the same outcome as non-POA.ConclusionThe prevalence of POA in elective orthopedic surgery in Sweden is at the same level as previously reported by others. Screening and treatment of POA would reduce costs based on less ABT and decreased LOS and may reduce complications in elective major orthopedic surgery.