首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Perioperative evaluation of regional aortic wall shear stress patterns in patients undergoing aortic valve and/or proximal thoracic aortic replacement
Authors:Emilie Bollache  Paul W.M. Fedak  Pim van Ooij  Ozair Rahman  S. Chris Malaisrie  Patrick M. McCarthy  James C. Carr  Alex Powell  Jeremy D. Collins  Michael Markl  Alex J. Barker
Affiliation:1. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill;3. Division of Surgery-Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill;5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill;2. Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;4. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Abstract:

Objectives

To assess in patients with aortopathy perioperative changes in thoracic aortic wall shear stress (WSS), which is known to affect arterial remodeling, and the effects of specific surgical interventions.

Methods

Presurgical and postsurgical aortic 4D flow MRI were performed in 33 patients with aortopathy (54 ± 14 years; 5 women; sinus of Valsalva (d_SOV)/midascending aortic (d_MAA) diameters = 44 ± 5/45 ± 6 mm) scheduled for aortic valve (AVR) and/or root (ARR) replacement. Control patients with aortopathy who did not have surgery were matched for age, sex, body size, and d_MAA (n = 20: 52 ± 14 years; 3 women; d_SOV/d_MAA = 42 ± 4/42 ± 4 mm). Regional aortic 3D systolic peak WSS was calculated. An atlas of WSS normal values was used to quantify the percentage of at-risk tissue area with abnormally high WSS, excluding the area to be resected/graft.

Results

Peak WSS and at-risk area showed low interobserver variability (≤0.09 [?0.3; 0.5] Pa and 1.1% [?7%; 9%], respectively). In control patients, WSS was stable over time (follow-up–baseline differences ≤0.02 Pa and 0.0%, respectively). Proximal aortic WSS decreased after AVR (n = 5; peak WSS difference ≤?0.41 Pa and at-risk area ≤?10%, P < .05 vs controls). WSS was increased after ARR in regions distal to the graft (peak WSS difference ≥0.16 Pa and at-risk area ≥4%, P < .05 vs AVR). Follow-up duration had no significant effects on these WSS changes, except when comparing ascending aortic peak WSS between ARR and AVR (P = .006).

Conclusions

Serial perioperative 4D flow MRI investigations showed distinct patterns of postsurgical changes in aortic WSS, which included both reductions and translocations. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings with clinical outcomes and prediction of risk of future aortic events.
Keywords:wall shear stress  aortic valve replacement  aortic root replacement  hemiarch repair  perioperative  4D flow MRI  2D  two-dimensional  3D  three-dimensional  4D flow MRI  three-dimensional time-resolved phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with three-directional velocity encoding  AA  ascending aorta  ARR  aortic root replacement  AVR  aortic valve replacement  BAV  bicuspid aortic valve  CE-MRA  contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography  DA  descending aorta  ECG  electrocardiogram  HA  hemiarch repair  LV  left ventricle  LVEF  left ventricular ejection fraction  LVSV  left ventricular stroke volume  MRI  magnetic resonance imaging  PC  phase-contrast  SOV  sinus of Valsalva  VS-ARR  valve-sparing ARR  WSS  wall shear stress
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号