Effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery alone or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy compared to conventional surgery and/or whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of one or more brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of SRS alone or in combination with WBRT compared to surgery and/or WBRT in prolonging survival and improving the quality-of-life and functional status of patients with brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and concurrent cohort studies examining SRS versus SRS + WBRT, SRS versus WBRT +/- surgical resection, SRS versus surgical resection only, or SRS + WBRT versus WBRT was conducted. Trial registers, bibliographic databases, and reference lists from selected studies and recent issues of relevant journals were searched. Neuro-oncology specialists were also contacted. All studies were analyzed independently by two reviewers, applying validated critical appraisal techniques. RESULTS: The review identified three RCTs and one cohort study. Among patients with multiple metastases, no difference in survival between those treated with WBRT + SRS and those treated with WBRT was found. However, in patients with one metastasis, a statistically significant difference, favoring those treated with WBRT + SRS, was observed. Regarding local tumor control at 24 months, rates were significantly higher in the WBRT + SRS treatment arm, regardless of the number of metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Adding SRS to WBRT improves survival in patients with one brain metastasis. Combining SRS and WBRT improves local tumour control and functional independence in all patients.