艾司西酞普兰合并动力性分析治疗难治性抑郁症临床疗效观察

目的 探讨艾司西酞普兰合并动力性分析对难治性抑郁症的疗效.方法 将63例抑郁症患者利用随机数学表法随机分为研究组31例(艾司西酞普兰合并动力性分析)和对照组32例(单用艾司西酞普兰),疗程为12周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定疗效.结果 治疗后第8,12周末,研究组的HAMD评分[8周末(17.35±2.98)分;12周末(9.26±3.46)分]显著低于对照组的HAMD评分[8周末(21.97±3.26)分;12周末(15.28±3.18)分,(P＜0.05)].研究组不良反应发生率25.81%,对照组不良反应发生率25%,2组差异无显著性(P＞0.05).结论 艾司西酞普兰合并动力性分析治疗难治性抑郁症能明显提高疗效,缓解更彻底,并不增加药物不良反应.

A comparative study of escitalopram angumentation with psychoanalysis in the treatment of refractory depression

Objective To investigate the efficacy of escitalopram combined with psychoanalysis in the treatment of refractory depression. Methods A total of 63 patients were randomly divided into escitalopram group ( n = 32) and escitalopram combined with psychoanalysis group( n = 31 ). All patients were evaluated with Hamilton depression Rating Scale(HAMD). Results After treatment,the scores of HAMD in two groups were both significantly lower than those before treatment. In the 8th ( ( HAMD ( 17.35 ± 2.98 ) ), 12th ( ( HAMD (9. 26 ±3.46) )weekend of treatment, the scores of HAMD in study group were significanlly lower than those in control group(8 th:21.97 ± 3.26; 12 th: 15.28 ± 3. 18 ). There were no significant differences in side effects between study group and control group. Conclusion Escitalopram angumented with psychoanalysis takes effects better than escitalopram single and doesn't increase side effects in the treatment of refractory depression.