Infant hearing screening with an automated auditory brainstem response screener and the auditory brainstem response |
| |
Authors: | S-J Chen EY Yang M-L Kwan P Chang A-S Shiao C-F Lien |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Paediatrics Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada;Department of Otolaryngology Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada;Veterans General Hospital—Taipei. National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan and School of Human Communication Disorder., Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() From 1653 babies hospitalized in the Veterans General Hospital—Taipei from 1993 to 1995, 260 infants at risk of hearing impairment were selected. The risk criteria of hearing impairment for neonates were based on the recommendation of the US Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, 1990 Position Statement. All these infants were screened with the Algo-1 Plus, an automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) screener at a mean postconceptional age of 40.7 ± 4.5 weeks. Thirty-nine cases (39/260, 15%) involving 57 ears (57/520, 11%), failed the screening. Except for one infant who died, the babies had an ABR test for both air- and bone-conducted stimuli and an otological examination. The case-specific incidence of conductive hearing deficit at the initial ABR test was 5.4%. The prevalence of sensorineural hearing deficits was between 2.3% confirmed and 3.1% including infants who did not have follow-up tests. The n-value that indicated agreement between the Algo-1 and ABR results was 0.64, and the overall efficiency of using Algo-1 to correctly identify pass or failure of the ABR was 83%. |
| |
Keywords: | Auditory brainstem response automated auditory brainstem response screener infant hearing screening |
|
|