2012年南京市机动车驾驶人酒驾率及相关行为特征

目的了解南京市综合干预后酒后驾驶现况及相关行为特征。方法采用路边随机拦截呼气酒精测试及问卷调查方式,了解南京市驾驶人酒驾率及相关行为特征。结果随机拦截机动车驾驶人员5 096人,检出饮酒者38人,均为男性,酒驾率为0.75%。小学及以下文化程度者酒驾率最高(3.60%),大专及以上者最低(0.26%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);有固定职业者酒驾率(0.59%)低于无固定职业者(1.15%),差异有统计学意义(P0.05);凌晨酒驾率最高(1.45%),不同时间段酒驾率差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。摩托车(5.92%)高于汽车(0.58%),非营运车(0.91%)高于营运车(0.18%),本次驾车时间≤0.5h(1.29%)高于0.5h(0.31%),未系安全带(头盔)(2.10%)高于系安全带(头盔)(0.45%),出行目的为餐饮(3.41%)高于因工作出行(0.05%),差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论干预后南京市酒驾率有所下降,但酒驾现象依然存在,仍应加强干预。

The incidence of drink driving and relevant behavior among motor drivers in Nanjing,2012

Objective To analyze drink driving status after multi-department intervention.Methods Random roadside breath testing for alcohol and questionnaire survey was conducted.Results Totally 5 096 motor drivers were enrolled this study,38 of which were all males with alcohol drinking,the incidence of drink driving（BAC〉0mg/100ml）was 0.75%,of which the highest（3.60%）were primary school or lower of the educational level and the lowest（0.26%）were university degree with meaningful statistic difference（P〈0.05）;fixed occupation（0.59%）were lower than non-fixed occupation（1.15%）with significant difference.The highest was at midnight（1.45%）and difference was shown on differ time with statistical significance（P〈0.05）.Motorcycle（5.92%）were higher than automobile（0.58%）,non-commercial vehicle（0.91%）were higher than commercial vehicle（0.1%）;driving duration for this time≤0.5h（1.29%）were higher than 〉0.5h（0.31%）;non-fasten seatbelt（or hamlet）（2.10%）were higher than fasten seat-belt（or helmet）（0.45%）;driving out for dinner（3.41%）were higher than for business（（0.05%）;which the differences were all shown with statistical significance（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The incidence of drink driving after intervention is lower than that of baseline.Persistent and reinforced intervention should be continued.